Posted on 09/15/2003 9:33:35 AM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
There is one type of private prayer, widely used in the west since the time of the Counter-Reformation, which has never been a feature of Orthodox spirituality — the formal ‘Meditation,’ made according to a ‘Method’ — the Ignatian, the Sulpician, the Salesian, or some other. Orthodox are encouraged to read the Bible or the Fathers slowly and thoughtfully; but such an exercise, while regarded as altogether excellent, is not considered to constitute prayer, nor has it been systematized and reduced to a ‘Method.’ Each is urged to read in the way that he finds most helpful.
But while Orthodox do not practise discursive Meditation, there is another type of personal prayer which has for many centuries played an extraordinarily important part in the life of Orthodoxy — the Jesus Prayer: "Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me a sinner." Since it is sometimes said that Orthodox do not pay sufficient attention to the person of the Incarnate Christ, it is worth pointing out that this — surely the most classic of all Orthodox prayers — is essentially a Christo-centric prayer, a prayer addressed to and concentrated upon the Lord Jesus. Those brought up in the tradition of the Jesus Prayer are never allowed for one moment to forget the Incarnate Christ.
As a help in reciting this prayer many Orthodox use a rosary, differing somewhat in structure from the western rosary; an Orthodox rosary is often made of wool, so that unlike a string of beads it makes no noise.
The Jesus Prayer is a prayer of marvelous versatility. It is a prayer for beginners, but equally a prayer that leads to the deepest mysteries of the contemplative life. It can be used by anyone, at any time, in any place: standing in queues, walking, traveling on buses or trains; when at work; when unable to sleep at night; at times of special anxiety when it is impossible to concentrate upon other kinds of prayer. But while of course every Christian can use the Prayer at odd moments in this way, it is a different matter to recite it more or less continually and to use the physical exercises which have become associated with it. Orthodox spiritual writers insist that those who use the Jesus Prayer systematically should, if possible, place themselves under the guidance of an experienced director and do nothing on their own initiative.
For some there comes a time when the Jesus Prayer ‘enters into the heart,’ so that it is no longer recited by a deliberate effort, but recites itself spontaneously, continuing even when a man talks or writes, present in his dreams, waking him up in the morning. In the words of Saint Isaac the Syrian: ‘When the Spirit takes its dwelling-place in a man he does not cease to pray, because the Spirit will constantly pray in him. Then, neither when he sleeps, nor when he is awake, will prayer be cut off from his soul; but when he eats and when he drinks, when he lies down or when he does any work, even when he is immersed in sleep, the perfumes of prayer will breathe in his heart spontaneously’ (Mystic Treatises, edited by Wensinck, p. 174).
Orthodox believe that the power of God is present in the Name of Jesus, so that the invocation of this Divine Name acts ‘as an effective sign of God’s action, as a sort of sacrament’ (Un Moine de l’Église d’Orient, La Priére de Jésus, Chevetogne, 1952, p. 87). ‘The Name of Jesus, present in the human heart, communicates to it the power of deification ... Shining through the heart, the light of the Name of Jesus illuminates all the universe’ (S. Bulgakov, The Orthodox Church, pp. 170-171).
Alike to those who recite it continually and to those who only employ it occasionally, the Jesus Prayer proves a great source of reassurance and joy. To quote the Pilgrim: ‘And that is how I go about now, and ceaselessly repeat the Prayer of Jesus, which is more precious and sweet to me than anything in the world. At times I do as much as 43 or 44 miles a day, and do not feel that I am walking at all. I am aware only of the fact that I am saying my Prayer. When the bitter cold pierces me, I begin to say my Prayer more earnestly, and I quickly become warm all over. When hunger begins to overcome me, I call more often on the Name of Jesus, and I forget my wish for food. When I fall ill and get rheumatism in my back and legs, I fix my thoughts on the Prayer, and do not notice the pain. If anyone harms me I have only to think, ‘How sweet is the Prayer of Jesus!’ and the injury and the anger alike pass away and I forget it all ... I thank God that I now understand the meaning of those words I heard in the Epistle — "Pray without ceasing" (1 Thes. 5:17)’ (The Way of a Pilgrim, p. 17-18).
As a help in reciting this prayer many Orthodox use a rosary, differing somewhat in structure from the western rosary; an Orthodox rosary is often made of wool, so that unlike a string of beads it makes no noise.
I've seen them made out of wood too.
Put bluntly, it would require a fair amount of research on my part before I could either question or affirm what it has to say. There is an unfortunate pattern of behavior in people that they are willing to "gloss over" certain details if it means arriving at a greater good (very often, the end result is not so "good" after all). That this could represent something of that nature makes me pause.
Blessed Mary is the "Hope of Christians", because in the ways God has glorified her, we also hope to receive His blessings. The Catechism of the Catholic Church reads in no. 966:
DRSJ: Jesus is the
"blessed hope" of Christians according to Paul. Titus 2:13 -- 13Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;
The Assumption of the Blessed Virgin is a singular participation in her Son's Resurrection and an anticipation of the resurrection of other Christians: "In giving birth you kept your virginity; in your Dormition you did not leave the world, O Mother of God, but were joined to the source of Life. You conceived the living God and, by your prayers, will deliver our souls from death." (Note 509 - Byzantine Liturgy, Troparion, Feast of the Dormition, August 15th)
DRSJ: Jesus is the firstfruits of the resurrection according to Paul. 1 Cor 15:20 -- 20But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept. [2] ...as our deliver and savior. (compare: Mathew 1:21 -- and thou shalt call his name Jesus: for he shall save his people from their sins.) ..... Mary is our salvation not because she redeemed us from sin, which Christ did alone, but because she brought us and still brings us grace and truth. DRSJ:
DRSJ: Notice how many of the things ascribed to Mary by the Catholic Church are ascribed to Jesus in the Bible.
Something to ponder. Could Christ have done it without her? In a certain sense no. He needed Mary to be truly made man. A theophany would not have sufficed for true God to be made true man.
And in another larger sense, yes.
Unless, of course, you believe that this was simply beyond what He is capable of.
The Virgin Birth was foretold and was a sign and wonder that heralded His arrival.
But if it was not to be, the prophets would have foretold a different prophecy and we would have still beheld a sign and wonder that heralded His arrival.
Still, not recognizing Mary as Christ's first and greatest Saint is not a wise path.
"O Hail Mother of God and Virgin, Mary full of Grace, the Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, for thou has given birth to the Savior of our souls."
Illuminating Egypt with the Light of Truth, you cast away the darkness of error. For the idols, unable to stand your might, fell down, and those who had been delivered from them cried out to the Mother of God:At that time, I sent off an e-mail to one of the priests asking him to explain why addressing Mary as Manna and the Pillar of Fire should not be considered blasphemous. (In retrospect, I wish I had also asked him about addressing Mary as the Rock (Petra : )) I received the following reply that I think is instructive toward addressing your concerns:Hail, O Resurrection of mankind!
Hail, O Downfall of the Demons!
Hail, O you who crushed the error of deceit!
Hail, O you who exposed the fraud of idols!
Hail, O Sea who drowned the symbolic Pharaon!
Hail, O Rock who quenched those who thirst for Life!
Hail, O Pillar of Fire who guided those in darkness!
Hail, O Shelter of the World, wider than the clouds!
Hail, O Food who took the place of Manna!
Hail, O Handmaid of holy delight!
Hail, O Land of the promised good!
Hail, O you who flow with milk and honey!
Hail, O Bride and Maiden ever-pure!
Sorry to keep you waiting...and yes, happy and graced Eastertide to you, too. You are referring to the Sixth Chant of the Akathist Hymn as presented on our website under Prayers/Litanies, and referring to the flight into Egypt.
The metaphors used to hail Mary are taken from the Hebrew scriptures and are indeed ambivalent, not to say ambiguous. The symbols used have typological meaning and are frequently applied to both Jesus and Mary corresponding to what is termed primary and secondary symbolization. For example, Christ is the new and definitive Manna; Mary is called Manna insofar as she nourished Jesus with her own flesh once he descended into the "desert" of human condition. Again, pillar of fire is used typologically, i.e., pillar of fire is a symbol of the definitive illumination and guidance received in Christ and his Spirit. Mary is the dawn preparing the coming of the Risen sun (Christ), thus a "pillar of fire" in her own and limited right.
Read within their proper context, these metaphors are theologically of interest and even challenging. Separated from their context they have indeed a blasphemous ring. Not to forget the following: the Akathist Hymn is an Annunciation hymn hailing Mary not for herself but for her role in the Incarnation. Thus, the hymn is primarily a christological spiritual poem.
There have always been more mysteries around than decades available.
This Orthodox Rosary includes three mysteries not in the traditional Rosary of Dominican Alan de Rupe or the five Luminous Mysteries of John Paul II:
1) The Birth of Mary
2) The Presentation of Mary in the Temple
3) The Flight into Egypt
The Franciscan Rosary from the 15th Century includes the mystery of:
1) The Visit of the Magi
It totals 7 decades of 10 Aves, plus two extra at the end are to symbolize the 72 years of Our Lady's life on earth.
Then there is the mystery of the Circumcision from the Chaplet of the Precious Blood.
Gathering all that up together, it wouldn't be hard to add yet another five mysteries to the Rosary, over and above the five Luminous Mysteries. To whit, the Joyful Mysteries could be increased to two sets of 5:
1) The Birth of Mary
2) The Presentation of Mary in the Temple
3) Annunciation
4) Visitation
5) Nativity
1) Circumcision
2) The Visit of the Magi
3) Presentation of Jesus in the Temple
4) The Flight into Egypt
5) Finding of Jesus in the Temple
I wonder how many other mysteries can be found on various Rosaries? The Precious Blood Chaplet also has the Piercing of Christ's side as the last Mystery. I suppose you could include the Assumption of St. Joseph and the Espousal of Blessed Mary. There must be others.
Anything is possible with God. But this type of speculation is absolutely ludicous; because as we all know, He chose to do it WITH her!
DRSJ: Jesus is the firstfruits of the resurrection according to Paul. 1 Cor 15:20 -- 20But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept.
The Resurrection and Assumption are not opposed to each other, but joined together. Matthew 27.52 notes that many Old Testament Saints arose with Christ. These were later taken up into heaven at the Ascension (Eph. 4.8-10). It is entriely fitting that Blessed Mary was assumed into heaven after her death to foreshadow the resurrection. Both events can give us Hope, because they are inextricably linked. Nobody denies that all these events are dependent upon the Reusrrection of Christ.
DRSJ: Grace and truth come through Jesus according to John. John 1:18 -- 17For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
Since grace is a participation in the divine life of the Holy Trinity, it inevitably "comes from" Jesus. But we say that it is mediated by the prayers of Mary. Our Lady does not originate the grace, but directs it to us her children through her prayers and supplications before the throne of God.
DRSJ: Notice how many of the things ascribed to Mary by the Catholic Church are ascribed to Jesus in the Bible.
I really don't see it that way at all. You are equating Jesus and Mary in a way that is quite foreign to Catholics (and Orthodox). Jesus is a divine person, one of the Holy Trinity, while Mary is just an ordinary human person who is filled with the life of God, both spiritually for her whole life, and physically for nine crucial months. There is an unbridgeable ontological divide there that no amount of praise to Blessed Mary for her divine maternity could ever breach.
Yoyur objections are the Nestorianism that underlies Protestantism coming to the surface.
I didn't mean to misterm it. You would agree, though, it has the same origin as a gloss of the Angelic Salutation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.