Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Slur on Mother Teresa in paper stuns Church
totalcatholic.com ^ | January 15, 2003

Posted on 01/15/2003 11:36:05 AM PST by heyheyhey

A bizarre attack on Mother Teresa published in a national newspaper last week has produced a reaction of surprise and dismay within the Church.

The article, by one of her long-term critics Christopher Hitchens, appeared in The Mirror under the headline 'Why Mother Teresa should not be a Saint' and proceeded to lambast the Vatican decision to beatify the nun in October.

In the article, Mr Hitchens asks why the traditional seven-year interval between the death of a person and their beatification, the standard first step on the path to sainthood, has been ignored in this case.He notes that Mother Teresa, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979, was first put forward for beatification only four years after her death and also claims only one miracle has been required of her when two are usually asked for.

Mr Hitchens' article comes after he previously published a book in which he accuses the Macedonia-born nun of exploiting her fame and receiving funding from questionable sources such as the Duvalier dictatorship in Haiti. He claims she was more interested in mixing with the rich and famous than helping the poor in Calcutta and never gave proper account of the huge sums of money donated to her.

Mr Hitchens also slams Mother Teresa's strict views on pro-life and contraception issues, and ends by saying he feels the media have created a 'collective hallucination' of her life.

But Church sources have dismissed Mr Hitchens' broadside, and a spokesman for the Bishops' Conference of England and Wales said Mother Teresa was 'an extraordinary woman whose goodness, humility and depth of faith are legendary.' 

'We rejoice in her beatification and would fully support the Holy See in the examination of the life and works of Mother Teresa as part of the canonisation process,' he added.

And Cardinal Jose Saraiva Martins, head of the Congregation of the Causes of Saints, has outlined her 'heroic virtues' to the Holy Father, saying a 'vast movement' in support of society's most marginalised was launched by Mother Teresa's example.

He also notes that under the present procedure, only one miracle is needed for beatification and a further one for sainthood. The Pope last week officially approved a first miracle directly attributed to Mother Teresa's intercession, which involved the recovery of an Indian woman.

The woman, Monika Besra, had a large ovarian cyst which disappeared completely as she slept shortly after an image of Mother Teresa was placed on her stomach on the anniversary of the nun's death. Her recovery was judged to be totally without any medical explanation by a panel of more than a dozen doctors consulted by the Vatican, and was adjudged to be the one miracle needed for the first stage of the process.


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 01/15/2003 11:36:05 AM PST by heyheyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Here is the related thread (but don't expect too many coherent posts in it),

Why Mother Teresa should not be a Saint

2 posted on 01/15/2003 11:36:34 AM PST by heyheyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD
Thanks Registered

3 posted on 01/15/2003 11:40:30 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
...woman whose goodness, humility and depth of faith are legendary.

Interesting choice of words. The definition of a legend is "An unverified story handed down from earlier times."

4 posted on 01/15/2003 12:10:01 PM PST by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
... Here we go again
5 posted on 01/15/2003 12:43:32 PM PST by heyheyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
Interesting choice of words. The definition of a legend is "An unverified story handed down from earlier times."

And your comment might have merit if the word "legend" was used. However it wasn't. The word is legendary and one of the definitions of legendary is: Extremely well known; famous or renowned. Disingenuousness is typical modus operandi of lying, ignorant bigots like yourself.

6 posted on 01/15/2003 6:15:38 PM PST by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
What gives you the right to call people names just because they comment on Teresa of Calcutta? The woman wasn't a saint and wasn't even a good catholic. She was a Universalist.
7 posted on 01/15/2003 6:33:48 PM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jael
They prefer not to deal with the real issue...Why the waving of the 7 years?

Personally I think it is a public relations move hoping folk will forget the sex scandles

8 posted on 01/15/2003 7:00:45 PM PST by RnMomof7 (I am the way the TRUTH and the life, no man comes to the father but by me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jael
What gives you the right to stick your big nose into my argument and try to defend a lying anti-Catholic bigot like Onelifetogive, puke.
9 posted on 01/15/2003 7:17:49 PM PST by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Personally, I think you are still a poorly spelling idiot, puke.
10 posted on 01/15/2003 7:19:00 PM PST by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
It's a free forum. Anyone can comment on anything. But you can't make personal attacks. His not being RC and not believing RC teaches doesn't give you the right to libel him.

Anti RC isn't a crime.
11 posted on 01/15/2003 7:22:51 PM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jael
You're an ignorant, hypocritical, idiot too and that's a fact not an attack. Your inability to discern the difference is indicative of your lack of gray matter. Your pal wasn't libeled. He/she/it demonstrated for all to see that he/she/it is a liar. Pointing out the truth is not a malicious attack on a person's reputation.

Anti RC isn't a crime.

During your long period of lurking you obviously missed Jim Robinson's admonition to all the Catholic bashers, puke. This isn't a free forum. It belongs to Robinson. You don't like it, hit the road.

12 posted on 01/15/2003 8:11:23 PM PST by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
"What gives you the right to stick your big nose into my argument and try to defend a lying anti-Catholic bigot like Onelifetogive, puke. "

It wasn't your argument either you opened your big mouth and it wasn't posted to you.

BTW Come up with something original.Your bigot mantra is old.

I know most papists don't really think for themselves but give it a try.

13 posted on 01/15/2003 8:38:38 PM PST by Joshua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
"Interesting choice of words. The definition of a legend is "An unverified story handed down from earlier times." "

This is Catholic bashing you well educated buffoon

14 posted on 01/15/2003 8:44:52 PM PST by Joshua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Joshua
I know most papists don't really think for themselves but give it a try.

Why don't you look at the beam in your own eyes before you remove the splinter from his? Your use of an age-old stereotype doesn't convince me much of your own originality. Added to that, you libel a VERY large group of people. You do yourself a great disservice just by posting.

15 posted on 01/15/2003 8:45:22 PM PST by Pyro7480 (+ Vive Jesus! (Live Jesus!) +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Joshua
? Don't want to be called for poor punctuation by this condescending twit.
16 posted on 01/15/2003 8:47:56 PM PST by Joshua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
"Why don't you look at the beam in your own eyes before you remove the splinter from his?"

I'll take the log out when i'm done. I'm tired of jerks calling people bigots everytime someone posts something they don't like. Jim Robinson didn't appoint him thought police of these threads.

There was nothing wrong with what was posted. SB just wanted to ridicule somebody. He's nothing more than a condescending boor

17 posted on 01/15/2003 9:04:03 PM PST by Joshua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
Hitchens hates her personally. He hates her for the same reason he would have hated Catherine of Siena: she was very strong and not the sweet little old lady that he would have preferred she be and she saw through him.
18 posted on 01/15/2003 9:13:29 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Someone who uses the word "puke" is calling you on your spelling.

Why don't we all chip in and buy him Playstation2 to keep him occupied and out of here?

19 posted on 01/15/2003 9:28:37 PM PST by Joshua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Joshua
Exactly what does "think for yourself," mean? I know it probabably means no more than "unlike me " but do give it a shot.
20 posted on 01/15/2003 9:42:03 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson