[Catholicguy]

Father Blet noted that members of the Society had been very warmly received during the Holy Year, but that things have slowed down a little since then due principally to the question of accepting Vatican II. He added that "this was not an impediment given that the Council had not promulgated any binding dogmatic definition. Everyone therefore has the right to examine what he feels able to accept..."

<> Were you defending this priest's position or not?

[Tantumergo]

"Were you defending this priest's position or not".

I was defending his reputation against your charges of heresy and schism, after one of your over the top knee jerk reactions. As part of his position is easily supported by previous cited quotes from Ratzinger and the Catholic Encyclopedia, I would certainly defend his statement:

"this was not an impediment given that the Council had not promulgated any binding dogmatic definition."