Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
It is an assumption on your part based on logic that the eternal life Jesus' speaks of in v.'s 53-58 is spiritual not physical. Why not use the same logic about his speaking of eating his flesh.? Logic based on the fact that the Law said Jews were forbidden to drink blood, forbidden by God to eat human flesh.

Gee, that's what I've been doing. To me, it's plain what John 6 is saying, as it is the rest of Scripture.

7,585 posted on 05/01/2002 11:44:39 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7582 | View Replies ]


To: Fury
Big Mack-It is an assumption on your part based on logic that the eternal life Jesus' speaks of in v.'s 53-58 is spiritual not physical. Why not use the same logic about his speaking of eating his flesh.? Logic based on the fact that the Law said Jews were forbidden to drink blood, forbidden by God to eat human flesh.

Fury-Gee, that's what I've been doing. To me, it's plain what John 6 is saying, as it is the rest of Scripture.

Fury, let me reason with you, if Jesus literally turned bread to human flesh, and wine to blood, and the disciples knew and understood what he had done when he gave them the bread and wine at the Passover meal, do you believe then that they now understood that the laws of clean and unclean foods were done away with from this time on?

JH

7,635 posted on 05/01/2002 1:41:06 PM PDT by JHavard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7585 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson