[medved]

There's more to it than that. Evolutionism poisons morality, politics, and science equally. The state of denial you see from official science bastians when cities are discovered beneath the waves off Cuba, under the Antarctic ice, and on Mars, arises from the fact that these things are all incompatible with the uniformitarian/evolutionist paradigm. Establishment scientists would rather trash the evidence than the paradigm.

[Dimensio]

There's more to it than that. Evolutionism poisons morality, politics, and science equally.

How? It shouldn't be poisoning anything other than science (and only then if evolution is demonstratably false). It's a biological theory -- applying it to your views of politics or morality is misapplying it; it isn't evolution's fault if it alters how you view morality or politics, it's your own for applying a biological theory to a construct that isn't biology! It's like trying to use gravitational theory to decide what colour car to purchase!

The state of denial you see from official science bastians when cities are discovered beneath the waves off Cuba, under the Antarctic ice, and on Mars, arises from the fact that these things are all incompatible with the uniformitarian/evolutionist paradigm.

I've not seen massive waves of denial about the cities under Cuba, just some dissention -- which is common in science (that's why you have peer review). I've not heard about cities under Antartica or on Mars. Nonetheless, finding cities anywhere doesn't disprove evolution. I cannot fathom how discovering buried "lost cities" would somehow falsify evolution. Archeaology is not biology.

[oldcats]

And what might this city on Mars be called....Medvedopolis? Got a map of it?
Oldcats

[oldcats]

And what might this city on Mars be called....Medvedopolis? Got a map of it?
Oldcats