Posted on 10/08/2024 8:32:26 AM PDT by ebb tide
Ping
Love it!
OMG!!
This is what a lot of us have thought for a while. So heartbreaking, but the important thing is God will be with us if we only ask.
Anyone who thinks that the Vatican told the truth about the 3rd secret is very gullible. Father Malachi Martin had read it. And while he could not disclose exactly what it was, he said enough that I know that it was much more dire than what the Vatican claimed it to be.
Pope Benedict, then Cardinal Ratzinger, told an ambassador that the Third Prophecy of Fatima and the Aketa Prophecy were almost the same: “The work of the devil will infiltrate even into the Church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, bishops against bishops, churches and altars sacked.” That’s enough weight to make me question the “revealed” prophecy at its face.
Ahh so we are going to play the, “who is lying game,” brought to you by the fraudulent and deceptive LifeSite. Yayyyy. Fun and games for all; and, with a bit of conspiracy thrown in.
I write this with a 3rd degree Saint Padre Pio relic in my pocket. Do I think Padre Pio lied about knowing the 3rd secret or that he knew about it before the visionaries? Nope. Did he publicly state what the 3rd secret was? Nope.
Other than speculation, has anyone (other that the Church) clearly, with full knowledge and personal review, definitevly stated the 3rd secret? Nope. And does such a person contradict the Chruch? Nope.
I have also read Fr. Amorth. Does he clearly state, in writing or otherwise, this conversation with Padre Pio? Nope. Has he clearly stated, writen or published the 3rd secret? Nope. Even if so, does he contradict or try to set the Church straight about the 3rd secret? Nope.
Has the Church through any Pope(and several had/have access), or someone who might actually have access to the 3rd secret, stated, proclaimed or published the deception that is published here by good ole LifeSite? Nope. Has anyone in this priveleged group ever disclaimed the Church’s position on the 3rd secret? Nope
It makes one wonder, “who is lying?” The Church? A Pope of any stripe? A person with actual knowledge? Saint Padre Pio, Father Amroth? Nope. Could it be Satan? Maybe the most reaonable answer and, the winner of the game, is... the author and his routinley dubious publisher!!! Yayyyy LifeSite. A Hall of Fame deceiver.
Thanks for playing! I am sure we will get to play this game again as these fake stores get posted to FR many, many more times than Carter’s has pills...
Not a surprise. Hopefully God intervenes and defeats His enemies soon.
Oh stop making sense:)
Do you get your Church news from Fr. James Martin’s America Magazine, published by the Jesuits?
Jimmy Martin isn’t a contestant. Who do you believe is the liar? I gave you a clue but, by your inane question, I have doubt about your ability to ferret out, that means discern, the truth
He either get his news from America, or National Catholic Distorter or New Ways Ministries.
Really? You and people of your ilk are pathetic. The Church is in perhaps the worst crisis in its history, and the only people you find worthy of criticism are those who try to defend the Faith. The neoconservative’s have been the bane of the Church since VII. You strain at gnats, but swallow camels.
WOW, WHAT A GREAT METAPHOR.
ANYTHING THAT HELPS THE CHURCH REALIZES AND ACTS ON THIS PHONY POPE’S DESIRES...IS IN FOR A FIGHT, BUT IT WILL BE WORTH IT.
I know it must seem like this is the worst problem in its History, but unfortunately and unbelievbly it is not the WORST.
THERE HAVE BEEN MANY “TIMES” ...THE IMPORTANT THING IS TO REMEMBER THAT OUR BELOVED, WONDERFUL, CHURCH WILL SURVIVE IT, AS IT HAS IN THE PAST.
THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE NOW IS TO TRY TO PLY THIS IDIOT JESUIT FROM THE PAPACY.
I AM CONFIDENT WE WILL PREVAIL AND pope FRANK WILL BE JUST A DISTANT MEMORY.
Me? Really? This article tries to make the case that every Pope from 1917 is complicit in some sort of abomination. Even Popes who became saints. Even before VII was conceived (and some grand conspiracy high jacked VII - the Jesuits!!! or some such evil.)
See #16. Understand history. This time is not the worst time in Church history. Not even close. Read the article. Read it again and again. Find one clearly, definable, documented fact written in the article that supports the headline or conclusions you desperately seek. Not hearsay or fantasy. Fact(s). You won’t find one. Not one. All you somehow read/state is that VII is evil. Sainted Popes John, Paul, John Paul II, and Pope Ben are somehow bad because of some taint. Others are just as bad. And the worst of all is duly elected Frankie the Jesuit who is somehow impropery involved with sinning homosexuals and Fr. Jimmy.
Find the facts not your feelings. Good luck.
I respectfully, disagree. We had morally corrupt popes before, but none of them has done has much damage to the Catholic Church as Jorge Bergoglio.
If you can name a pope who you think has done more damage, please name him.
Neglect is mild in comparision to Bergoglio's deliberate attacks on the Catholic Church.
I could argue every post-conciliar pope, except for Pope Bendedict could also be guilty of neglect.
I would also wage more Catholics have left the Catholic Church since VCII than those who left during Alexander's time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.