[daniel1212]

One examination by a dispensationalist vs preterism - https://www.bible.ca/revelation/Bible%20Only%20Revelation%20Commentary%20Full-Preterism%20refuted%20Steven%20Rudd.pdf - , though while being one of the former, I do not deeply get much into this debate on this non-salvlfic issue, nor necessarily affirm all that a referenced site provides. -

[kinsman redeemer]

I was saved in the early 80s - at about 25 y.o.

The next day I went into a local Christian book store and bought my first study Bible - a Scofield Study Bible.

I was intrigued by dispensationalism as a way of dividing the Word literally, and seeing it as a way to “understand what God wanted mankind to know and how to faithfully respond to Him at various times - through faith.”

I also understand that it rejects “replacement theology” and takes a premillennial position re. Christ’s return. It generally takes a pre-Trib rapture position - and on that point, I have in a “wait-and-see” position.

I was happy to read that you call yourself a dispensationalist.

Over the years good people have argued against this perspective and I have listened but I’ve never been persuaded to leave it.

[Elsie]

... I do not deeply get much into this debate on this non-salvlfic issue, nor necessarily affirm all that a referenced site provides. -

I see...