Micro-evolution is a fact. No one disputes that.
When anyone attempts to argue with me that macro-evolution is also a fact, my argument against it is:
There would have to be a new male species that was born to some other species.
At the same time, there would have to be a female of the same species born at the same time.
Both this new male and female would have to survive to adulthood.
Animals that are deformed die very early on.
They’d have to be born in the same very small geographical area in order to find each other.
Both would be a genetic deformity of the previous generations of the same species.
There would only be an extremely small chance they would even make it to adulthood.
There is zero evidence of any transitory species. If this was not a fact, there would be thousands, if not millions, of transitory species in existence today. There are none.
Every species on the planet is “transitional” - this is because there is no ultimate or final species. Species branch out from one another, sometimes species go extinct, leaving gaps between the extant branches.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitional_fossil