61 And again, as pertaining to the law of the priesthood—if any man espouse a virgin, and desire to espouse aanother, and the first give her consent, and if he espouse the second, and they are virgins, and have vowed to no other man, then is he justified; he cannot commit adultery for they are given unto him; for he cannot commit adultery with that that belongeth unto him and to no one else.
62 And if he have aten virgins given unto him by this law, he cannot commit adultery, for they belong to him, and they are given unto him; therefore is he justified.
Seems pretty clear to me.
Please note that I don't support this at all, but LDS "Scriptures" are very clear on the subject.
Read Under the Banner of Heaven by Jon Krakauer. FDLS is sick.
those that consider LDS just another sect of the umbrella term ‘christianity’, will look upon this as another reason to say ‘no thanks’ to any sort of preaching.
I do not blame them one bit. In this time, where folks judge not the person, but their association, examples like this bunch really do great examples of negative advertising.
This is why it’s pretty clear that some 12 year old kid having hallucinations about golden plates being handed to him is not a basis for religion.
Stoke the fires of Hell - someone’s coming soon!!
Mormons are a cult period.
There used to be a fire breathing contingent of Mormons on this site that would kick ass and take names if you even dared to question the sanity of their odd little cult. Apparently they either left on their own, or, hopefully, JR kicked them out for good.