Heterosexual marriage only being supported by Sacred Scripture will be "rigid" one day to V2 modernists?
The V2 modernists have already challenged Pope St. Peter declaring there is no other name under heaven given among men whereby we might be saved in Acts 4 with their push towards universalism along with challenging other Sacred Scripture combined with their unending attacks on Sacred Tradition.
A.) Jorge Bergoglio and numerous bishops have shown they are not the kind, caring Vatican 2 they made themselves out to be.
B.) This is Bergoglio on a quest to be rigid against rigidity, being collegial with James Martin types and when giving awards to pro-aborts, and bending over backwards for Germans who disobey the deposit of faith, but not being collegial with Traditionalists.
C.) All the while everyone else gets the Syndol Way while Bergoglio is hypocritically dictatorial with Traditionalists in that he said the bishops are to ensure that groups already celebrating the TLM “do not deny the validity and the legitimacy of the liturgical reform dictated by Vatican Council II and the Magisterium of the supreme pontiffs” while every conceivable Novus Ordo mass under the sun is allowed, crazy antics, such as hip hop music and worse during masses taking place.
D.) The signatories to Vatican II refused to take an oath against modernism, but now demand allegiance to modernism (we can see its fruit above) - or else! Renewal allegiances at each mass? This isn’t conversion through free will but through coercion. And he does the finger wag now after being party to schism himself by blessing the Pachamama representatives and naked Pachamama idol from the Amazon synod while bowing before it, as seen on video.
I provided exact quotes and any spelling errors from them aren’t my doing.
I’m not Catholic and even I find this news repulsive and offensive.
Modernism is founded on the historic discovery that “God is dead.” So what good can come from it?