Posted on 09/26/2020 7:21:17 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Satanism, and motherhood converged in the pages of the Huffington Post on Thursday when Jamie Smith, an attorney and mom, wrote that the death of the Supreme Court justice motivated her to join the Satanic Temple.
“I am a 40-something attorney and mother who lives in a quiet neighborhood with a yard and a garage full of scooters and soccer balls,” Smith said. “I often walk with my children to get ice cream and spend weekends hiking through a national park. I am not the type of person who would normally consider becoming a Satanist, but these are not normal times.”
When Ginsburg passed, Smith said she didn’t feel sorrow but rather fear that America is headed toward “theocracy or dictatorship,” writing:
When Justice Ginsburg died, I knew immediately that action was needed on a scale we have not seen before. Our democracy has become so fragile that the loss of one of the last guardians of common sense and decency in government less than two months before a pivotal election has put our civil and reproductive rights in danger like never before. And, so, I have turned to Satanism.
“Satanic Temple” began trending on Twitter as readers reacted to the article. Smith’s self-serious tone was met with conservatives taking the piece incredibly seriously, eager to amplify an article that confirmed the left’s fondness for the Devil himself.
Unlike what many conservatives seemed to believe, I don’t think this article was a harbinger of the left’s wholesale departure into explicit Satan worship. We should, however, analyze Smith’s argument seriously, as her claims and their implications paint a troubling picture of the dangerous ideology pervading today’s left.
Smith assured her readers that, not to be confused with the Church of Satan, the Satanic Temple doesn’t actually worship him. Most of the temple’s adherents are atheists, viewing Satan as a symbol of rebellion. According to Smith, members reject the supernatural in favor of reason.
Like other religions, Smith said, members of the Satanic Temple adopt a set of beliefs. In this case, it’s seven tenets, which include that people “should strive to act with compassion and empathy” and that “one’s body is inviolable, subject to one’s own will alone.”
“Reading through the Seven Tenets, I was struck by how closely they aligned with the unwritten code I had used to try to guide my own life for several years,” Smith wrote. “I realized, happily, that these were my people and that I had been a Satanist for several years without even knowing it.”
One tenet, in particular, is notable: “The struggle for justice is an ongoing and necessary pursuit that should prevail over laws and institutions.” In other words, the law is dispensable in the pursuit of justice — a remarkable statement coming from an attorney. The ends of equity justify the means of tearing down institutions. Sound familiar?
This principle, which the Satanic Temple articulates and Smith affirms, absolves the rioters pillaging America’s cities under the guise of “social justice.” It supports illegal social programs that promote a so-called oppressed group while discriminating against another group. It exonerates election fraud by those who reason that the “fascist” must be removed from the White House by any means necessary. This idea reeks of moral relativism and guarantees lawlessness.
To adopt a tenet such as this is an interesting response to the death of a Supreme Court justice and an interesting way to cope with the fear that one’s legal rights will be infringed. If equity is greater than the law, how does the Constitution fit in? If justice “should prevail over laws and institutions,” there will be nothing left for the Supreme Court, an institution itself, to protect.
The Problem of Religious Freedom for Moral Relativism Another major problem with Smith’s argument is that she seeks to give religious legitimacy to a group defined by relativism.
Of course, the No. 1 issue for Smith is abortion, or as she euphemistically calls it, “reproductive rights.” Without Ginsburg’s vote and voice on the court, Smith argues, “Roe v. Wade is in imminent danger of being overturned not based on legal arguments or scientific reasoning, but because of religious objections to what is a safe and necessary procedure.”
Therefore, Smith has joined the efforts of the Satanic Temple in bringing lawsuits that demand religious liberty for its members, elevating their open-ended tenets to the same level as firmly held religious beliefs.
“[N]o one should have to follow a law that violates their deeply held religious beliefs,” Smith said. “If a Christian should not have to do so based on their religion, a Satanist should not have to either. This is what equality under the law means on a fundamental level.”
She continued, “There is a real chance that the Supreme Court will be lost for a generation or more to justices appointed for their religious beliefs rather than a deep understanding of the Constitution or a desire for justice to be carried out on an impartial basis.”
Note the logical inconsistency of her arguments. Smith adheres to a set of tenets that rejects the supremacy of law but then bemoans Christians’ use of “religious objections” over “legal arguments.” She then delegitimizes religious protections, but in the same breath demands them for her cult.
These Tenets Belong to the Broader Left Smith’s biggest problem isn’t that she’s identifying with an organization whose namesake is Satan. Her biggest problem is the complete lack of rationality and consistency in her worldview that claims to be founded on those very things, at the expense of the supernatural. The broader issue, however, is that Smith’s arguments represent the doctrine of the left.
While most leftists aren’t lining up to join the Satanic Temple explicitly, they do subscribe to its tenets. This is obvious in their push for abortion and transgender acceptance, their distaste for the Constitution, and their endorsement of protests-turned-riots.
When justice is more important than the law, and relativism receives religious freedom, the end is anarchy — and that’s a serious problem indeed.
End Times Ping
The Battle Lines are being drawn and the spiritual warfare is showing itself.
Pray without ceasing!
PM me if you wish to be added/removed from the End Times Ping List.
Maranatha! Our Lord is coming soon!
Satanic Temple articles
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3887455/posts
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3887357/posts
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3887256/posts
Satanic Temple is a group of misguided atheists/humanist idiots with a clickbait-ish name. They don’t believe in or worship Satan.
The entire article seems like a publicity stunt for the Huffington Post - they must need the attention.
What about the baby’s inviolable rights?
It’s so easy. Don’t want to get pregnant? Don’t have sex. So easy. Why do they insist on killing babies? Why don’t they take the easy route?
They could be lying about their actual beliefs for public consumption.
Satan is “the father of ____”
The answer is obvious. She should be disbarred. The law school that gave her her JD should lose their accreditation.
We’ll see how they feel about their decision when things start going “bump in the night” and apparitions start appearing before them. Let’s see how long they are cavalier about talking with, and being controlled by, demons.
Very true!
There are a few local idiots in my neck of the woods who are pleading for ‘advice’ on how to get rid of “Spirits” from their homes after dabbling in the dark arts. They won’t leave.
The horrible advice given makes me SMH and chuckle at the same time.
So it is okay to “worship “ (be a member of a cult named to honor) Satan?
The liberals do, of course, but now explicitly and in public.
Temples are places of worship. If there is no worship, why would they call this a Satanic Temple?
Beyond arrogance, hateful of all that is Godly.
Wish I could see her standing before God and telling Him she is wiser than
He is and He is wrong about the murder of innocent babies, and see her at the pearly gates, hollering at God that he must move over because she is in charge now and God should hit the road.
Q: What’s the difference between a Satanist and a Leftist?
A: The Satanist is willing to admit who he is working for.
But where is their culturally misappropriated Kente cloths?
Great White Throne Judgement of Revelation 20.
It’s going to be ugly for all these eternal losers who think they can eliminate God and usurp His Authority in His Creation.
She says she doesn’t worship Satan, only his rebellion. Satan is in rebellion against God and so is she. She isn’t fooling anyone with her double talk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.