From: Isaiah 52:13-53:12
Fourth Song of the Servant of the Lord
[1] Who has believed what we have heard? And to whom has the arm of the LORD been revealed? [2] For he grew up before him like a young plant, and like a root out of dry ground; he had no form or comeliness that we should look at him, and no beauty that we should desire him. [3] He was despised and rejected by men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief; and as one from whom men hide their faces he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
[4] Surely he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows; yet we esteemed him stricken, smitten by God, and afflicted. [5] But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities; upon him was the chastisement that made us whole, and with his stripes we are healed. [6] All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all.
[7] He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth; like a lamb that is led to the slaughter, and like a sheep that before its shearers is dumb, so he opened not his mouth. [8] By oppression and judgment he was taken away; and as for his generation, who considered that he was cut off out of the land of the living, stricken for the transgression of my people? [9] And they made his grave with the wicked and with a rich man in his death, although he had done no violence, and there was no deceit in his mouth.
[10] Yet it was the will of the LORD to bruise him; he has put him to grief; when he makes himself an offering for sin, he shall see his offspring, he shall prolong his days; the will of the LORD shall prosper in his hand; [11] he shall see the fruit of the travail of his soul and be satisfied; by his knowledge shall the righteous one, my servant, make many to be accounted righteous; and be shall bear their iniquities.
[12] Therefore I will divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he poured out his soul to death, and was numbered with the transgressors; yet he bore the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.
***********************************************************************
Commentary:
52:13-53:12. This fourth Song of the Servant is one of the most commented on passages in the Bible, as regards both its literary structure and its content. From the point of view of structure, it interrupts the hymn-style of chapter 52 (which is taken up again in chapter 54); the style here is more reflective; the theme, the value of suffering. In terms of content, the song is unusual in that it shows the servant triumphing through his humiliation and suffering. Even more than that—he makes the pains and sins of others his own, in order to heal them and set them free. Prior to this, the idea of “vicarious expiation” was unknown in the Bible. The passage is original even in its vocabulary: it contains forty words that are not to be found elsewhere in the Bible.
The poem, which is very carefully composed, divides into three stanzas: the first (52:13-15) is put on the Lord?s lips and it acts as a kind of overture to what follows—taking in the themes of the triumph of the servant (v. 13), his humiliation and suffering (v. 14), and the stunning effect that this has on his own people and on strangers.
The second stanza (53:1-11a) celebrates the servant?s trials, and the good effects they produce. This is spoken in the first person plural, standing for the people and the prophet: both feel solidarity with the servant of the Lord. This stanza has four stages to it: first (53:1-3) it describes the servant?s noble origins (he grew up before the Lord like a young plant: cf. v. 2) and the low esteem in which he is held as a ?man of sorrows?. Then we learn that all this suffering is atonement for the sins of others (53:4-6). Traditionally, suffering was interpreted as being a punishment for sins, but here it is borne on behalf of others. This is the first lesson to be learned by those who see him ?stricken, smitten by God, and afflicted?, and it marks the climax of the poem. Thirdly (53:7-9), the point is made, again that he has freely accepted suffering and meekly, offers himself as a sacrifice of atonement (he is like a lamb, like a sheep). His death is as ignominious as the suffering that precedes it. Finally (vv. 10-11a) we are told how fruitful all this suffering is: like the patriarchs of old (the text seems to imply) the servant will have many offspring and a long life and be a man of great wisdom.
In the, third stanza (53:11b-12) the Lord speaks again, finally acknowledging that his servant?s sacrifice is truly efficacious: he will cause many to be accounted ?righteous?, that is, he will win their salvation (v. 11) and will share in the Lord?s spoils (v. 12).
The fourth song of the servant of the Lord was from very early on interpreted as having a current application. When the Jews of Alexandria made the Greek translation of the Old Testment (the Septuagint) around the second century BC, they tinkered a little with the text to indicate that the servant in the poem stood for the people of Israel in the diaspora. Those Jews, who encountered huge obstacles in their effort to maintain their identity in that Hellenistic and polytheistic environment, found comfort in the hope that they would emerge enhanced, just like the servant.
Jews of Palestine identified the victorious servant with the Messiah, but they reinterpreted the sufferings described here to apply them to the pagan nations. The Dead Sea Scrolls interpret this song in the light of the ignominy experienced by the Teacher of Righteousness,the probable founder of the group that established itself at Qumran.
Jesus revealed his redemptive mission to be that of the suffering servant prophesied by Isaiah here. He referred to him on a number of occasions—in his reply to the request made by the sons of Zebedee (“the Son of man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many”: Mt 20:28 and par.); at the Last Supper, when he announced his ignominious death among transgressors, quoting 53:12 (Lk 22:37); in some passages in the fourth Gospel (Jn 12:32, 37-38); etc. He also seems to refer to it in his conversation with the disciples of Emmaus (Lk 24:25ff) to explain his passion and death. Therefore, the first Christians interpreted Jesus? death and resurrection in terms of this poem; evidence of this is the expression “in accordance with the scriptures” in 1 Corinthians 15:3; the words “for our trespasses” (Rom 4:25; 1 Cor 15:3?5); the Christological hymn in the Letter to the Philippians (Phil 2:6-11); and expressions used in the First Letter of Peter (1 Pet 2:22-25) and in other New Testament passages (Mt 8:17; 27:29; Acts 8:26-40; Rom 10:16; etc.).
Patristic tradition reads the song as a prophecy that found fulfillment in Christ (cf. St Clement of Rome, “Ad Corinthios”, 16:1-14; St Ignatius Martyr, “Epistula ad Polycarpum”, 1, 3; the so-called “Letter of Barnabas”, 5, 2 and “Epistula ad Diognetuin”, 9, 2; etc.). The Church uses it in the Good Friday liturgy.
52:14. “Beyond human semblance”: this phrase sums up the description given in 53:2-3 and shows the intense pain reflected in the servant’s face: the description is so graphic that Christian ascetical writing, with good reason, reads it as anticipating the passion of our Lord: “The prophet, who has rightly been called ‘the Fifth Evangelist’, presents in this Song an image of the sufferings of the Servant with a realism as acute as if he were seeing them with his own eyes: the eyes of the body and of the spirit. [...] The Song of the SufferingServant contains a description in which it is possible, in a certain sense, to identify the stages of Christ?s Passion in their various details: the arrest, the humiliation, the blows, the spitting, the contempt for the prisoner, the unjust sentence, and then the scourging, the crowning with thorns and the mocking, the carrying of the Cross, the crucifixion and the agony” (John Paul II, “Salvifici Doloris”, 17; cf. idem, “Dives in Misencordia”, 7).
53:1. St Paul cites this verse to prove the need for preaching (Rom 10:16). The verse also underlines the extraordinary degree of undeserved suffering endured by the Servant. It is sometimes interpreted as a further sign of the humility of Christ, who, being divine, took on the form of a servant: “Christ is a man of humble thought and feeling, unlike those who attack his flock. The heart of God’s majesty, the Lord Jesus Christ, did not come with loud cries of arrogance and pride; he came in humility, as the Holy Spirit said of him: “Who has believed what we have heard?” (St Clement of Rome, “Ad Corinthios”, 16, 1-3).
53:4-5. “He has borne our griefs [or pains]”: the servant’s sufferings are no due to his own personal sins; they are atonement for the sins of others. “The sufferings of our Savior are our cure” (Theodoret of Cyrus, “De Incarnatione Domini”, 28). He suffered on account of the sins of the entire people, even though he was not guilty of them. By bearing the penalty for those sins, he expiated the guilt involved. St Matthew, after recounting some miraculous cures and the casting out of devils, sees the words of v. 4a fulfilled in Christ (Mt 8:17). He interprets Jesus Christ as being the servant foretold by the prophet, who will cure the physical suffering of people as a sign that he is curing the root cause of all types of evil, that is, sin, iniquity (v. 5). The miracles worked by Jesus for the sick are therefore a sign of Redemption: ?Christ?s whole life is a mystery of “redemption”. Redemption comes to us above all through the blood of his cross (cf. Eph 1:7; Col 1:13-14; 1 Pet 1:18-19), but this mystery is at work throughout Christ?s entire life? (”Catechism of the Catholic Church”, 517).
From: Hebrews 4:14-16; 5:7-9
Our Confidence is Based on Christ’s Priesthood
Christ Has Been Made High Priest by God the Father
***********************************************************************
Commentary:
14-16. The text now reverts to its main theme (cf. 2:17), that is, the priesthood of Christ. It highlights the dignity of the new high
priest, who has passed through the heavens; and His mercy, too, for He sympathizes with our weaknesses. We have, therefore, every reason to approach Him with confidence. “The believers were at that time in a storm of temptation; that is why the Apostle is consoling them, saying that our High Priest not only knows, as God, the weaknesses of our nature: as man, He has also experienced the sufferings that affect us, although He was free from sin. Since He knows our weaknesses so well, He can give us the help we need, and when He comes to judge us, He will take that weakness into account in His sentence” (”Interpretatio Ep. Ad Haebreos, ad loc.”).
We should respond to the Lord’s goodness by staying true to our profession of faith. The confession or profession of faith referred to
here is not simply an external declaration: external confession is necessary but there must also be commitment and a spirit of fidelity.
A Christian needs to live up to all the demands of his calling; he should be single-minded and free from doubts.
15. “If we should some time find ourselves sorely tempted by our enemies, it will greatly help us to remember that we have on our side a high priest who is most compassionate, for He chose to experience all kinds of temptation” (”St. Pius V Catechism”, IV, 15, 14). In order to understand and help a sinner to get over his falls and cope with temptation, one does not oneself need to have experience of being tempted; in fact, only one who does not sin knows the full force of temptation, because the sinner gives in prior to resisting to the end. Christ never yielded to temptation. He therefore experienced much more than we do (because we are often defeated by temptation) the full rigor and violence of those temptations which He chose to undergo as man at particular points in His life. Our Lord, then, allowed Himself to be tempted, in order to set us an example and prevent us from ever losing confidence in our ability to resist temptation with the help of grace (cf. notes on Matthew 4:1-11 and paragraph).
“There is no man”, St. Jerome comments, “who can resist all tests except He who, made in our likeness, has experienced everything but sin” (”Comm. In Ioannam”, II, 46). Christ’s sinlessness, often affirmed in Sacred Scripture (Romans 8:3; 2 Corinthians 5:21; John 8:46; 1 Peter 1:19; 2:21-24), follows logically from His being God and from His human integrity and holiness. At the same time Christ’s weakness, which He chose to experience out of love for us, is a kind of invitation from God to pray for strength to resist sin. “Let us adore Christ who emptied Himself to assume the condition of a slave. He was tempted in every way that we are, but did not sin. Let us turn in prayer to Him, saying, ‘You took on our human weakness. Be the eyes of the blind, the strength of the weak, the friend of the lonely’” (”Liturgy of the Hours”, Christmas Day, Evening Prayer I).
16. The “throne” is the symbol of Christ’s authority; He is King of the living and the dead. But here it speaks of a “throne of grace”:
through the salvation worked by Christ, the compassionate Priest and Intercessor, God’s throne has become a judgment seat from which mercy flows. Christ has initiated for mankind a time of forgiveness and sanctification in which He does not yet manifest His position as Sovereign Judge. Christ’s priesthood did not cease to operate with His death; it continues in Heaven, where He forever pleads on our behalf, and therefore we should have confident recourse to Him.
“What security should be ours in considering the mercy of the Lord! ‘He has but to cry for redress, and I, the Ever-Merciful, will listen
to him’ (Exodus 22:27). It is an invitation, a promise that He will not fail to fulfill. ‘Let us then with confidence draw near to the
throne of grace, and we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need’. The enemies of our sanctification will be rendered
powerless if the mercy of God goes before us. And if through our own fault and human weakness we should fall, the Lord comes to our aid and raises us up” ([St] J. Escriva, “Christ Is Passing By”, 7).
7-9. This brief summary of Christ’s life stresses his perfect obedience to the Father’s will, his intense prayer and his sufferings and
redemptive death. As in the hymn to Christ in Philippians 2:6-11, the point is made that Christ set his power aside and, despite his being the only-begotten Son of God, out of obedience chose to die on the cross. His death was a true self-offering expressed in that “loud voice” when he cried out to the Father just before he died, “into thy hands I commit my spirit” (Lk 23:46). But although Jesus’ obedience was most obvious on Calvary, it was a constant feature of “the days of his flesh”: he obeyed Mary and Joseph, seeing in them the authority of the heavenly Father; he was obedient to political and religious authorities; and he always obeyed the Father, identifying himself with him to such a degree that he could say, “I have glorified thee on earth, having accomplished the work which thou gavest me to do [...]. All mine are thine and thine are mine” (Jn 17:4, 10).
The passage also points to Jesus prayer, the high point of which occurred in Gethsemane on the eve of his passion. The reference to
“loud cries and supplications” recalls the Gospel account of his suffering: “And being in an agony he prayed more earnestly; and his
sweat became like great drops of blood falling down upon the ground” (Lk 22:44).
Hebrews 5:7-9 is probably referring not so much to his prayer in the Garden, still less to any prayer of Christ asking to be delivered from death, but to our Lord’s constant prayer for the salvation of mankind. “When the Apostle speaks of these supplications and cries of Jesus,” St John Chrysostom comments, “he does not mean prayers which he made on his own behalf but prayers for those who would later believe in him. And, due to the fact that the Jews did not yet have the elevated concept of Christ that they ought to have had, St Paul says that ‘he was heard’, just as the Lord himself told his disciples, to console them, ‘If you loved me, you would have rejoiced, because I go to the Father; for the Father is greater than I’ [...]. Such was the respect and reverence shown by the Son, that God the Father could not but take note and heed his Son and his prayers” (”Hom. on Heb”, 11).
7. “In the days of his flesh”, a reference to the Incarnation. “Flesh” is synonymous with mortal life; this is a reference to Christ’s human nature—as in the prologue to St John’s Gospel (elf. Jn 1:14) and many other places (Heb 2:14; Gal 2:20; Phil 1:22-24; 1 Pet 4:1-2) including where mention is made of Jesus being a servant and capable of suffering (cf. Phil 2:8; Mt 20:27-28). Jesus’ human nature “in the days of his flesh” is quite different from his divine nature and also from his human nature after its glorification (cf. 1 Cor 15:50). “It must be said that the word ‘flesh’ is occasionally used to refer to the weakness of the flesh, as it says in 1 Cor 15:50: ‘flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God’. Christ had a weak and mortal flesh. Therefore it says in the text, ‘In the days of his flesh’, referring to when he was living in a flesh which seemed to be like sinful flesh, but which was sinless” (St Thomas Aquinas, “Commentary on Heb”, 5, 1). So, this text underlines our Lord’s being both Victim and Priest.
“Prayers and supplications”: very fitting in a priest. The two words mean much the same; together they are a form of words which used to be employed in petitions to the king or some important official. The plural tells us that there were lots of these petitions. The writer seems to have in mind the picture of the Redeemer who “going a little farther fell on his face and prayed, ‘My Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me; nevertheless, not as I will, but as thou wilt” (Mt 26:39). St Thomas comments on this description of Christ’s prayer as follows: “His action was indeed one of offering prayers and supplications, that is, a spiritual sacrifice: that was what Christ offered. It speaks of prayers in the sense of petitions because ‘The prayer of a righteous man has great power’ (Jas 5:16); and it speaks of supplications to emphasize the humility of the one who is praying, who falls on his knees, as we see happening in the case of him who ‘fell on his face and prayed’ (Mt 26:39)” (”Commentary on Heb”, 5, 1).
To emphasize the force of Christ’s prayer, the writer adds, “with loud cries and tears”. According to rabbinical teaching, there were three degrees of prayer, each stronger than the last—supplications, cries and tears. Christian tradition has always been touched by the humanity of the Redeemer as revealed in the way he prays. “Everything that is being said here may be summed up in one word—humility: that stops the mouths of those who blaspheme against Christ’s divinity saying that it is completely inappropriate for a God to act like this. For, on the contrary, the Godhead laid it down that [Christ’s] human nature should suffer all this, in order to show us the extreme to which he truly became incarnate and assumed a human nature, and to show us that the mystery of salvation was accomplished in a real and not an apparent or fictitious manner” (Theodoret of Cyrus, “Interpretatio Ep. ad Haebreos, ad loc.”). Christ’s prayer, moreover, teaches us that prayer must 1) be fervent and 2) involve interior pain. “Christ had both [fervor and pain], for the Apostle by mentioning ‘tears’ intends to show the interior groaning of him who weeps in this way [...]. But he did not weep on his own account: he wept for us, who receive the fruit of his passion” (St Thomas, “Commentary on Heb., ad loc.”).
“He was heard for his godly fear.” St John Chrysostom’s commentary is very apposite: “’He gave himself up for our sins’, he says in Gal 1:4; and elsewhere (cf. 1 Tim 2:6) he adds, ‘He gave himself as a ransom for all’. What does he mean by this? Do you not see that he is speaking with humility of himself, because of his mortal flesh? And, nevertheless, because he is the Son, it says that he was heard for his godly fear” (”Hom. on Heb.”, 8). It is like a loving contention between Father and Son. The Son wins the Father’s admiration, so generous is his self-surrender.
And yet Christ’s prayer did not seem to be heeded, for his Father God did not save him from ignominious death—the cup he had to drink—nor were all the Jews, for whom he prayed, converted. But it was only apparently so: in fact Christ’s prayer was heard. It is true that, like every one, the idea of dying was repugnant to him, because he had a natural instinct to live; but, on the other hand, he wished to die through a deliberate and rational act of his will, hence in the course of the prayer, he said, “not my will, but thine, be done” (Lk 22:42). Similarly Christ wanted to save all mankind—but he wanted them to accept salvation freely (cf. “Commentary on Heb., ad loc.”).
8. In Christ there are two perfect and complete natures and therefore two different levels of knowledge—divine knowledge and human
knowledge. Christ’s human knowledge includes 1 ) the knowledge that the blessed in heaven have, that is, the knowledge that comes form direct vision of the divine essence; 2) the knowledge with which God endowed man before original sin (infused knowledge); and 3) the knowledge which man acquires through experience. This last-mentioned knowledge could and in fact did increase (cf. Lk 2:52) in Christ’s case. Christ’s painful experience of the passion, for example, increased this last type of knowledge, which is why the verse says that Christ learned obedience through suffering. There was a Greek proverb which said, “Sufferings are lessons.” Christ’s teaching and example raise this positive view of suffering onto the supernatural level. “In ‘suffering there is concealed’ a particular ‘power that draws a person interiorly close to Christ’, a special grace [...]. A result of such a conversion is not only that the individual discovers the salvific meaning of suffering but above all that he becomes a completely new person. He discovers a new dimension, as it were, ‘of his entire life and vocation’” (John Paul II, “Salvifici Doloris”, 26).
In our Lord’s case, his experience of suffering was connected with his generosity in obedience. He freely chose to obey even unto death (cf. Heb 10:5-9; Rom 5:19; Phil 2:8), consciously atoning for the first sin, a sin of disobedience. “In his suffering, sins are canceled out precisely because he alone as the only-begotten Son could take them upon himself, accept them ‘with that love for the Father which overcomes’ the evil of every sin; in a certain sense he annihilates this evil in the spiritual space of the relationship between God and humanity, and fills this space with good” (”Salvifici Doloris”, 17). Christ “learned obedience” not in the sense that this virtue developed in him, for his human nature was perfect in its holiness, but in the sense that he put into operation the infused virtue his human soul already possessed. “Christ knew what obedience was from all eternity, but he learned obedience in practice through the severities he underwent particularly in his passion and death” (St Thomas Aquinas, “Commentary on Heb., ad loc.”).
Christ’s example of obedience is something we should copy. A Christian writer of the fifth century, Diadochus of Photike, wrote: “The Lord loved (obedience) because it was the way to bring about man’s salvation and he obeyed his Father unto the cross and unto death; however, his obedience did not in any sense diminish his majesty. And so, having—by his obedience—dissolved man’s disobedience, he chose to lead to blessed and immortal life those who followed the way of obedience” (”Chapters on Spiritual Perfection”, 41).
9. Obviously Christ as God could not increase in perfection. Nor could his sacred humanity become any holier, for from the moment of his Incarnation he received the fullness of grace, that is, he had the maximum degree of holiness a man could have. In this connection Thomas Aquinas points out that Christ had union (that is, the personal union to the Son of God gratuitously bestowed on human nature): clearly this grace is infinite as the person of the Word is infinite. The other grace is habitual grace which, although it is received in a limited human nature, is yet infinite in its perfection because grace was conferred on Christ as the universal source of the justification of human nature (cf. “Summa Theologiae”, III, q. 7, a. 11). In what sense, then, could Christ be “made perfect”? St Thomas provides the answer: Christ, through his passion, achieved a special glory—the impassibility and glorification of his body. Moreover, he attained the same perfections as we shall participate in when we are raised from the dead in glory, those of us who believe in him (cf. “Commentary on Heb., ad loc.”). For this reason our Redeemer could exclaim before his death, “It is finished” (Jn 19:30)—referring not only to his own sacrifice but also to the fact that he had completely accomplished the redeeming atonement. Christ triumphed on the cross and attained perfection for himself and for others. In Hebrews the same verb is used for what is translated into English as “to be made perfect” and “to finish”. Christ, moreover, by obeying and becoming a perfect victim, truly pleasing to the Father, is more perfectly positioned to perfect others. “Obedience” is essentially docility to what God asks of us and readiness to listen to him (cf. Rom 1:5; 16:26; 2 Cor 10:5; Heb 4:3). Christ’s obedience is a source of salvation for us; if we imitate him we will truly form one body with him and he will be able to pass on to us the fullness of his grace.
“Now, when you find it hard to obey, remember your Lord: ‘factus obediens usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis”: obedient even to accepting death, death on a cross!’” ([St] J. Escriva, “The Way”, 628).