You write: My group” (Catholics) believe and profess the Catholic Faith as it was once taught by the Catholic Church.
This is your infallible statement because “my group believe and profess...” according to who??? It always remains in your subjectivism and relativism without the guidance of the authority that Christ left us on earth. I admit we are being now punished by God as the prophecy of Saint Francis explains. But those with true humility will be protected in the arc of the New Testament, the Immaculate Heart of Mary, just as the few were saved in the arc of Noah before Christ.
You write: “There was no misinterpretation”. The misinterpretation was well organized and promoted. Why did Pope Benedict try so hard to create a reform of the reform of the misinterpretation of the liturgy? Why did the Neocatecumens not obey the Liturgical Books that Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict ordered?
Visit: “THE NEOCATECUMENAL MASS”:
http://spir-food.blogspot.it/2015/02/the-neocatecumenal-mass.html
https://www.scribd.com/doc/256475113/The-Neocatecumenal-Mass
Msgr. Athanasius Schneider - “The (Neocatecumenal) Way is a TROJAN HORSE in the Church” (March 6, 2016; http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2016/04/exclusive-interview-with-bishop.html).
You are focused on the liturgy. The non-Catholic Vatican II changes involved much more than the liturgy and even Benedict professed the new, false Religion of Ecumenism. After all, he was a periti at the Council!
Sorry, you and yours merely continue the farce by insisting that the Crisis is the result of a "misinterpretation" of the Second Vatican Council.
I know that I believe the Catholic Faith before Vatican II because I know that the Catholic Church can not contradict its own Magisterium. That is Catholic teaching. Vatican II contradicts previous Magisterium; therefore, it can not be Catholic teaching. Don't bother telling me your article answers these objections because it doesn't.