Skip to comments.
Colombian Professor Criticizes Pope Francis, Declared Excommunicated [Catholic Caucus]
One Peter Five ^
| July 31, 2017
| Maike HIckson
Posted on 08/01/2017 7:59:10 AM PDT by ebb tide
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
08/01/2017 7:59:10 AM PDT
by
ebb tide
To: ebb tide
Francis needs to GO
2
posted on
08/01/2017 8:24:11 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: ebb tide
There is no acceptance at all of dissent within the Church. The pope is the supreme, and only authority.
Note that this priest was kicked out for saying: “the present pontiffs election was the work of a political and corrupt mafia of cardinals”.
Note that the current pope has not yet condemned those who took part in the gay orgy at the Vatican, and he promoted the nuclear ‘deal’ with Iran.
3
posted on
08/01/2017 8:27:51 AM PDT
by
I want the USA back
(If free speech is taken away, dumb and silent we are led, like sheep to the slaughter: G Washington)
To: ebb tide
Bergoglio again disgraces himself and the Papacy, while shaming over a billion of the laity... How long must this continue? Why have the faithful clergy chosen to not yet unify to defend the Church? We know nothing shall prevail against the Apostolic Church, but it still sickens me to witness such heresies!
4
posted on
08/01/2017 8:38:13 AM PDT
by
heterosupremacist
(Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
To: heterosupremacist
In Old Testament times God would have sent the Babylonians to sack the Temple and carry the people off to captivity. Would not want to be in Rome right now.
5
posted on
08/01/2017 8:46:44 AM PDT
by
JerryBlackwell
(some animals are more equal than others)
To: heterosupremacist
Personally, I keep thinking/hoping the guy might be a short-termer, due to operating on only one lung.
The lack of information among the laity is a factor as well. Most of my Catholic friends just know the Pope from his charming soundbites, not the offensive ones.
6
posted on
08/01/2017 8:56:34 AM PDT
by
married21
( As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
To: I want the USA back
The pope is the supreme, and only authority.
No. The Pope is the Vicar of Christ, who is the ultimate of authority of the Church. He is charged with protecting Church Teaching, Dogma and Tradition.
While Pope is the earthly head of the Roman Catholic Church, his authority has restrictions on it. He is a monarch, but nowhere has the Church ever taught that he can contradict Church teaching, or the good of the Church.
A monsignor does NOT have the authority to declare a latae sententiae excommunication, which is best declared only for actions that are clear-cut rather than words (e.g. successfully procuring or helping to procure an abortion). If anyone were serious about this, the layman who would be excommunicated should have an opportunity to receive a formal charge, and respond to it. Latae sententiae is a lazy out, and should apply to every Catholic government official who has voted for abortion would be subject to it if it were that easy. (Of course, they may already be, and they are likely in a state of continuous mortal sin and cannot recieve Cmmunion anyway).
7
posted on
08/01/2017 9:00:21 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: married21
#6 married21 - " The lack of information among the laity is a factor as well". Agreed. The clergy must be held accountable for not speaking out against these unpleasant developments...
8
posted on
08/01/2017 9:07:07 AM PDT
by
heterosupremacist
(Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
To: Dr. Sivana
That’s all true, but just a minor point: “monsignor” is a mis-translation of the Spanish or possibly Italian original, where monseñor is the title used when addressing or speaking about a bishop. So these are bishops, actually, the Colombian bishops’ conference, apparently.
That said, if they chose the latae sententiae route, essentially saying he has automatically excommunicated himself, that means that they didn’t want to do a formal excommunication, probably because they knew there simply weren’t grounds for it. Cowardly weasels, in other words.
9
posted on
08/01/2017 9:09:01 AM PDT
by
livius
To: ebb tide
Francis the floozy calling others schism mongerers...
10
posted on
08/01/2017 9:31:15 AM PDT
by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
To: heterosupremacist
Why have the faithful clergy chosen to not yet unify to defend the Church? By choosing not to do so, how are they "faithful clergy"? Whatever happened to the Dubia Three by the way?
11
posted on
08/01/2017 9:33:09 AM PDT
by
piusv
(Pray for a return to the pre-Vatican II (Catholic) Faith)
To: ebb tide
Interesting...excommunicated for words, while liberal politicians and quacks in the US who aggressively push, commit and fund child murder get a pass.
Nice going, Frank.
12
posted on
08/01/2017 10:15:34 AM PDT
by
DPMD
To: livius
monsignor is a mis-translation of the Spanish or possibly Italian original, where monseñor is the title used when addressing or speaking about a bishop.
Ah, I hadn't known the expression. I know that the French often referred to Archbishop Lefebvre as Monsignor, I hadn't known that mode was common in the Spanish/Italian-speaking world as well. Thanks for the gentle correction.
13
posted on
08/01/2017 10:24:32 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: livius; Dr. Sivana
15
posted on
08/01/2017 10:56:33 AM PDT
by
ebb tide
(Shaking dust off feet)
To: JAKraig
There are many who are Vicars of Christ. In the Roman Catholic Church the Pope is simply the senior Cardinal
The Pope is not necessarily a "senior Cardinal" or a Cardinal at all. He is accurately described as the "Bishop of Rome". As to the rest of your piece, I was addressing those who are Roman Catholic and accept the Catholic definition of things. Catholics do not accept there being more than one Vicar of Christ at a time.
16
posted on
08/01/2017 11:04:34 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: piusv
By choosing not to do so, how are they "faithful clergy"? . You raise a valid point.
17
posted on
08/01/2017 11:28:32 AM PDT
by
heterosupremacist
(Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
To: Dr. Sivana; ebb tide; piusv
THANK you.
There had to be a difference between “obedience to a Holy Father” and being led to perdition!
Scripture is plain that Wolves will be among the Sheep and will lead many to perdition. Seems to me that what is obvious today is crystal clear in that scripture passage.
The Rome crowd seems to change nothing on paper, but fiddles with everything, in practice. This enables them to claim Tradition, officially, while in practice allowing deviant interpretation willy nilly.
18
posted on
08/01/2017 11:34:57 AM PDT
by
RitaOK
(Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Academia are the farm team for more Marxists coming... infinitum.)
To: ebb tide
ebb tide - For what its worth, there is no Bishop Pedro Mercado listed on the Church Hierarchy website.
http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/bishop/llm2.html
I don’t understand your comment, what is the significance of his non-inclusion in this list?
19
posted on
08/01/2017 11:35:11 AM PDT
by
heterosupremacist
(Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
To: heterosupremacist
I was just pointing out that no bishop has yet been identified as issuing the declaration of “excommunication”.
20
posted on
08/01/2017 11:39:00 AM PDT
by
ebb tide
(Shaking dust off feet)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson