[BlueDragon]

Go for it. Disprove my direct quotes of you your arch-heretic.

You your? And that uh, you-your Pope, Francis the talking Francis? A heretic? Yes, or no?

Luther is said to have written approximately 60,000 pages...
If claiming to be quoting Luther "directly" you'll need to provide more specific details. Second-hand, and third-hand quotes, coming from who knows where, are not sufficient.

Posting a link to Amazon.com is also insufficient. I don't play go fetch.

If you think I should go to Amazon.com, and buy a book in order to search out proof for your own argument-- then at the least, you could read a few links through, when I post them to you?

Will you?

Yes, or no?

Here, try these;

Defending O'Hare's Facts About Luther: A Roman defender attempts to give credence to one of the worst books on Luther ever written.

Defending O'Hare's Facts About Luther (Continued)- A Roman defender gives up defending one of the worst books on Luther ever written.

Roman Apologist Art Sippo on Father O’Hare’s “Facts About Luther”"> - Catholic apologist Art Sippo says do not read The Facts About Luther.

*after the link(s) is Swan's own brief description*

[i'd wager i'll need to spoon-feed it...and the, ah, babies will keep turning their faces away, refusing to eat. i hate it when that happens...]

[ebb tide]

I gave you direct quotes of Luther.

You have only provided second and third-hand quotes. If you think a book authored by Martin Luther is not good enough for you, I can’t help you.

You’re not fooling anyone.

[ebb tide]

You are quoting a Luther worshiper’s website who quotes a Catholic medical doctor who is not qualified in theology nor apologetics.

I have been quoting Luther directly and providing you with a source to them.

As I said, you are are not fooling anyone.

[ebb tide]

And that uh, you-your Pope, Francis the talking Francis? A heretic? Yes, or no?

Yes

If you want to continue in your pathetic attempt at a defense of Luther, start a new thread. It wasn't I who brought him up on this thread.