And of course, I don't agree that he revolted against "Church doctrine which was always Church doctrine." What was "revolted" against was not "always" Church doctrine, but was made up later. That doesn't mate me de facto wrong, it means we disagree. I of course, think you're wrong :)
Give me an example of a church doctrine that wasn’t always a doctrine of the Catholic Church at that time (doctrine, not abuses...which are two different things).