“Oh really. Here is my first post, please point out what was offensive...”Msgr ignored the Brazilian team who wore bodysuits to pick some non-competitive team in a non-competitive uniform. It was not Alinsky to call him out for the poor choice of an example.”
What is offensive is the lie it contains. Before you jumped in with your ludicrous fabrication, he was not called out for “poor choice of example.” He was accused of saying things he did not say. Your assertion that he was called out for “poor choice of example” is what sane people call “a lie.” Lying is offensive.
“There is a moral aspect to rejecting women being forced to wear burka’s”
Ah, another lie. No one here, least of all Msgr. Pope, implied that women should be forced to wear burkas. (Note that an apostrophe is used to form a contraction or a possessive, but never, never, never a plural.) Your lying is morally offensive.
“That is why the example was morally offensive to some.”
And another lie. The Egyptians weren’t wearing burkas. Burkas play no part in the discussion, except as liars bring them up in an attempt to obscure the actual point.
The point is that there is no need for women’s volleyball competitors to display their labia minora and points inward as they play.
“you can re-correct words my phones auto-correct butchered”
Yeah, sure. Autocorrect. That’s the ticket. Let’s say that.
“what would be really nice is if you could fix the original article.”
The original article is just fine. What needs to be fixed is your integrity.
You have not made any defense other than to call me a liar and nitpick grammar.
My last post on this thread was a linked article with a discussion regarding the issue I raised and you didn’t address either point.
1. Picking a team that got crushed is a poor example that uniform “doesn’t matter” when a team that won was available.
2. Picking a team that would face violence if they wore anything less modest is a poor example when one was available that chose modesty when they had the freedom not too.
But rail on against your straw-man and keep telling yourself all is well.
It still remains a poor example, I’m still easily amused and willing to spend the next year(s) responding to your posts and pointing it out time and time again. Perhaps if we keep going, we can even get “bad example” associated with the authors name in google search.
I have made an argument on the points and you are insulting me personally. Next time you insult my integrity, I’ll also hit the report button. Either address the issue, or go away.
“What is offensive is the lie it contains. Before you jumped in with your ludicrous fabrication, he was not called out for “poor choice of example.” He was accused of saying things he did not say. Your assertion that he was called out for “poor choice of example” is what sane people call “a lie.” Lying is offensive.”
From post 33:
“The time for your complaint was at the onset of the sport and not now. Your arguments at this late date cite the example of EGYPTIAN females as being properly attired.”
My first post was 190:
I did not state that EVERYONE had issues with that example, or that the example was their only issue. I simply stated that he was called out on it. I have provided you with the quote where that was done in a post prior to mine.
You talk about integrity... now show some integrity.