To: ealgeone
66 years ago isn’t what I meant by “recent”.
Rephrased: that time span would mean several popes have said nothing of primary importance.
39 posted on
05/25/2016 8:22:20 AM PDT by
ctdonath2
("Get the he11 out of my way!" - John Galt)
To: ctdonath2
That’s the most recent I’m aware of. Perhaps our Catholic friends have an update.
41 posted on
05/25/2016 9:34:00 AM PDT by
ealgeone
To: ctdonath2
Rephrased: that time span would mean several popes have said nothing of primary importance.What do you expect from a church that has NOT changed at all in almost 2000 years?
51 posted on
05/25/2016 10:22:03 AM PDT by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: ctdonath2
"Rephrased: that time span would mean several popes have said nothing of primary importance." That doesn't follow logically at all. Scripture is of primary importance. Sacred Tradition (big "T") is of primary importance. The entire Ordinary Magisterium of the Church is of primary importance. Any time the pope is teaching these, he is teaching things of primary importrance.
You are perhaps looking for inspired novelties? God spare us from such.
64 posted on
05/25/2016 3:17:07 PM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
("What people will submit to, is the exact measure of injustice which will be imposed upon them.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson