To: Repent and Believe
I am familiar with the position, held by many sedevacantists, that there has not been a valid papacy since 1958, but I do not find it convincing.
38 posted on
05/16/2016 3:07:53 PM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(Stone cold sober, as a matter of fact.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
“...there has not been a valid papacy since 1958, but I do not find it convincing.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The apostles creed states that there will be the resurrection of the body.
Mr. Ratzinger claimed to be pope while holding that there is no resurrection of the body.
Is he free of heresy?
50 posted on
05/16/2016 8:30:01 PM PDT by
Repent and Believe
("...to neglect to confound evil men...is no less a sin than to encourage them." Pope St. Felix III)
To: Mrs. Don-o; Repent and Believe; SGNA
I am familiar with the position, held by many sedevacantists, that there has not been a valid papacy since 1958, but I do not find it convincing. Not nearly as unconvincing as the true Church of Christ (via her popes) teaching and endorsing heresy for 50+ years.
63 posted on
05/17/2016 2:47:04 AM PDT by
piusv
(The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson