should Julius III be declared an anti-pope for his Nazi-like order to burn Jewish property?
No, I don't think so; perhaps you (or I) don't understand the term anti-pope. He should be judged by King Messiah for what he did and did not do, just as I posted previously with Matthew, Catholic chapter twenty five.
Anti-pope, anti-Semite, whatever. I don't care about the rules about anti-popes.
He should be judged by King Messiah for what he did and did not do, just as I posted previously with Matthew, Catholic chapter twenty five.
Okay, why do you judge Luther as an anti-Semite for his nazi-like statements, and not pope Julius III for his nazi-like actions? Luther just talked, Julius actually acted.