Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PC(USA) Montreat Conf. Organizer Claims John 3:16 'Used for Hate, Intimidation and Fear'
Christian Post ^ | 01/14/2016 | Michael Gryboski

Posted on 01/14/2016 8:34:05 AM PST by SeekAndFind

An organizer for the PC(USA)'s annual Montreat College Conference in North Carolina has claimed that the Bible verse John 3:16 has been "used for hate, intimidation and fear."

Montreat Director of Programs, the Rev. Katie Cashwell, told Presbyterian News Service in an interview last week that the theme for the four-day event, "Reclaim John 3:16," focused on her belief that the verse has been misused in the recent past.

"Our focus was to reclaim the well-known Bible verse in John 3:16 as a message of love and welcome," said Cashwell, according to the Presbyterian News Service. "Too often it's been used for hate, intimidation and fear."

When The Christian Post contacted PC(USA) and Montreat for clarification about the John 3:16 declaration and information regarding incidents in which the verse had been used for hate, PC(USA) directed this reporter to Montreat, which declined to comment.

Similarly, in a promotional video posted to YouTube months before the conference was held last week, organizers did not specify incidents in which the verse was used for hateful purposes.

Instead, the 67-second ad for the youth event showed specific examples of how ubiquoutious the verse is in popular culture, including a brief showing of the verse citation painted under Tim Tebow's eyes.

"It seems to be the verse that is quoted a lot. We see it everywhere --T-shirts, billboards, homemade roadside signs, jewelry, tattoos. … It's also a verse that has been used in damaging ways and ways of exclusion," according to the conference website, which states the purpose of centering the event around John 3:16 was to look at efforts to evangelize in a diverse religious environment, such as a college campus. But again, no examples were povided to show hateful use of the verse.

"So how can we take it back?" the site continues. "Or start thinking about what it means for our lives? What did Jesus really mean when he said that? It is actually a text about a God that loves and gives. It is a text that invites us to life."

Ginna Bairby, managing editor of Unbound and associate for Young Adult Social Witness at PC(USA), was a featured speaker at one of the event's workshops, titled: "A Gospel of Dirt," and asked the question: "What if we really acted like we believed that God loves the world? That God became flesh and dwelt among us? What might we approach -- differently?"

The conference has been held annually since 2007, and this year's event at the Montreat Conference Center broke an attendance record with approximately 1,100 attendees.


TOPICS: Current Events; Mainline Protestant; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: gospel; john316; pcusa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: House Atreides; Iscool

Thanks, House. Tell Iscool; he’s the one who claims they’re the same.


21 posted on 01/14/2016 9:52:46 AM PST by Al Hitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DSH
But we read it in the English language; not everyone is a Greek scholar.

John 3:17 New International Version (NIV) 17 For G-d did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through Him.

But be that as it may, the two verses read as one. It seems a bit awkward to end John3:16 with "shall not perish but have everlasting life - then continue with "Not/no G-d did not send His son ...."? How did no/not turn into 'for'?

22 posted on 01/14/2016 9:55:25 AM PST by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
Yeah, I can see it.

To those that do not want to follow God's plan, it must seem pretty divisive to suggest that they are excluded from eternal life.

But that's their choice.

23 posted on 01/14/2016 9:55:42 AM PST by chesley (Obama -- Muslim or dhimmi? And does it matter?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan
OPC, PCA, and PCUSA are the same denomination, right?

You're kidding (or trolling), right?

24 posted on 01/14/2016 9:59:29 AM PST by Lee N. Field ("I don't care if there's a billion of you. You're in a cult.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lurk

What about Sunday school? Just wondering because I taught Catechism this past fall. Is there enough context there to distinguish between preaching vs children’s religious instruction?


25 posted on 01/14/2016 10:35:59 AM PST by To Hell With Poverty (All freedom must be transported in bottles of 3 oz or less. - Freeper relictele)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: To Hell With Poverty

The standard is 1 Tim. 2:9-15. Women are able to teach women and children.


26 posted on 01/14/2016 2:34:55 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

An excellent example of why we should not have women preachers. :O)


27 posted on 01/15/2016 5:07:36 AM PST by HarleyD ("... letters are weighty, but his .. presence is weak, and his speech of no account.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson