Posted on 11/04/2015 4:51:33 AM PST by BlatherNaut
Is a homosexual agenda unduly influencing the outcome of the Synod on the family? It’s a question that needs to be raised because snippets gleaned from the Vatican in recent years seem to point in this direction...
...If this article has put the jigsaw together properly we must surmise that the sex abuse crisis is not over for the Church. The secular and Catholic media’s failure to report it accurately, and an over focus on paedophilia not homosexuality meant that sexually active gay men hiding behind dog collars remain free to betray their vows as priests. Having avoided exposure so far they have grown in confidence to the point they may even have called this Synod in the first place, not to speak of family life but to fight for their cause. What is chilling as we watch the second Synod unfold is that high ranking voices in the Vatican are confirming that the question of Holy Communion for divorced and re-married is a smoke-screen and that the homosexuality is the Synod’s true agenda.
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
Are any priests not gay? After reading that article, it seems a fair question. Not all are practicing, but....
Is a bear Catholic? Is the pope’s a****** watertight? Does a duck s*** in the woods?
I know that the pope isn't exactly like a CEO, but if he knows of men specifically part of the gay lobby in the Vatican, GET THEM THE HELL OUT! Relieve them of their positions and laicize them. And if the cabal replaces them with others, get rid of them, too. Keep at it until they're gone or at least weakened to where they have no influence anymore. It's not brain surgery.
Comment from the article:
Patsy Koenig
The author affirmed that the St. Gallen Mafia pressured Pope Benedict XVI to resign. That makes Benedict’s resignation invalid according to Canon Law 332.2. And he is therefore, still the pope, per canon law. Also, the same St. Gallen Mafia canvassed for votes to elect BerGOGlio, which was made illegal per canon law, under Pope Saint John Paul II. Therefore, BerGOGlio’s election to the papacy is invalid, per canon law.
I read 75% are homosexual. Unfortunately, can’t remember where.
Who’s BerGOGlio?
I’m amazed there were only 6 comments on this post. Maybe FR already knew all about the Gay Mafia and Pope Francis being chosen by them. I was not aware, and would like to know more.
WOW, is this really true?
And this institution is supposed to produce fruit of the Spirit, and protect/feed the sheep?
I know I’m an outsider, but dang, something is wrong here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.