Joan Frawley says that the new annulment rules may result in a trickle --- not a stampede --- offering the Diocese of Madison as an example.
The big take-away may be that now it's all going to be on the shoulders of the bishops, themselves, personally.
To: verga
2 posted on
09/16/2015 3:29:36 PM PDT by
verga
(I might as well be playng chess with pigeons.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
1. Both spouses have to petition for it together, or if not, then the other party must at least consent to it.Sorry. It still sounds like uncontested "catholic divorce".
3 posted on
09/16/2015 3:52:27 PM PDT by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
To: Mrs. Don-o; verga
4 posted on
09/16/2015 4:06:12 PM PDT by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
To: Mrs. Don-o; verga; piusv; BlatherNaut
10 posted on
09/16/2015 5:09:39 PM PDT by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
23 posted on
09/16/2015 6:59:48 PM PDT by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
If the marriage was consummated, does annulment mean it never happened?
31 posted on
09/17/2015 3:23:41 AM PDT by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson