Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: kinsman redeemer
You say "lapsed". I say "former."

I would only be guilty if I DIDNT include my experience with the Carholic Church as part of my life story- my "testimony" of what God offered and what I received by faith.

One (of the many ) error of the Catholic Church is the guilt that is placed on the minds of their adherents for not following all of their sundry rules ("don't touch, don't eat, make a "good" act of contrition)

A good act of contrition is fundamental, so to speak. It seems to me one flavor of the daily bread offered up on the Religion Forum is a persisent antiCatholicism baked by lapsed Catholics trying to scratch off their baptism by any means necessary. The witness is presents is negative and typical of a latter claimant to the throne whose legitimacy rests on destroying its predecessor. It cannot rest until the former is destroyed because the former is a living testimony that the new religion is illegitimate. Thus it has no message in and of itself; it is always defined by its opposition to its predecessor.

150 posted on 05/04/2015 4:58:18 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: af_vet_1981
A good act of contrition is fundamental, so to speak. It seems to me one flavor of the daily bread offered up on the Religion Forum is a persistent antiCatholicism baked by lapsed Catholics trying to scratch off their baptism by any means necessary. The witness is presents is negative and typical of a latter claimant to the throne whose legitimacy rests on destroying its predecessor. It cannot rest until the former is destroyed because the former is a living testimony that the new religion is illegitimate. Thus it has no message in and of itself; it is always defined by its opposition to its predecessor.

Thank you for the response.

You seized on the act of contrition - a memorized Catholic prayer. Then you repeated your claim that former Catholics are trying to relieve their consciences because Catholicism somehow sticks and must be "scratched off."

.

Let me say in no uncertain terms: When I trusted Christ as my personal Lord and Savior, old things (like my involvement in your religion) were passed away ("scratched off" in a sense) and everything became new. I was a new man. Born again by the Spirit of God.

Once saved, I was baptized - as a believer- I was baptized for the FIRST time. The choice that my parents made to undergo a baptism ritual when I was an infant had no real meaning at all. Neither did any of the other "sacraments" that I went through.

Everything I have declared here is based on God's Word. I can supply the support, if you'd like.

(If someone is reading and wants to know why I believe as I do, send me FREEPmail. I would love to communicate with you!)

.

Here is a funny anecdote relating to my "Act of Contrition" prayers.

Catholics say that if you're in the 2nd grade, then you should be trained to receive the "Holy Eucharist" ((or at least they did in the last century)) To accomplish this, you had to have been trained to go into the box to tell the priest your sins: "Bless me, Father, for I have sinned..." Then you would get your penalty list and count of memorized prayers to pray, along with a "good Act of Contrition."

I thought I had it down pretty good- and that if I died at the right time I'd go straight to heaven. If I died at the wrong time, fortunately there was a back-up plan and I would not go to hell.

But tragically, I had misunderstood something fundamental to a "good" Act of Contrition.

For a few years, I thought the prayer started like this:
Oh! My God, I am hardly sorry for having offended Thee..."

I don't think mine was a "good" prayer, since the adverb is supposed to be: "heartily" - It seems to change the meaning of the prayer slightly.

Every time I think about that, I laugh.

151 posted on 05/04/2015 6:12:42 AM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: Zionist Conspirator; af_vet_1981
Ping for the rich irony.

The witness [it] presents is negative and typical of a latter claimant to the throne whose legitimacy rests on destroying its predecessor. It cannot rest until the former is destroyed because the former is a living testimony that the new religion is illegitimate. Thus it has no message in and of itself; it is always defined by its opposition to its predecessor.

152 posted on 05/04/2015 6:22:57 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: Zionist Conspirator; af_vet_1981
Ping for the rich irony.

The witness [it] presents is negative and typical of a latter claimant to the throne whose legitimacy rests on destroying its predecessor. It cannot rest until the former is destroyed because the former is a living testimony that the new religion is illegitimate. Thus it has no message in and of itself; it is always defined by its opposition to its predecessor.

153 posted on 05/04/2015 6:22:58 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: af_vet_1981

I just have to LOL.


165 posted on 05/04/2015 7:28:49 AM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson