To: Elsie
I guess you can ignore the words of learned Catholic scholars if you want... I'm not ignoring them. You posted this entire thing back at #236. I went through and covered most of that in my Post #253. You ignored nearly all of my response, other than to change the topic to distract from your gaffe of citing to Vatican I (the most strongly pro-Papal council ever) when trying to argue against the Papacy.
So here you are now, tossing up the same stuff. This is rather typical of Catholic critics: challenge, ignore, repeat.
329 posted on
02/15/2015 4:53:11 PM PST by
CpnHook
To: CpnHook
I went through and covered most of that in my Post #253.MOST?
347 posted on
02/16/2015 6:56:12 AM PST by
Elsie
( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: CpnHook
I went through and covered most of that in my Post #253.MOST?
348 posted on
02/16/2015 6:56:25 AM PST by
Elsie
( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: CpnHook
...other than to change the topic to distract from your gaffe of citing to Vatican I (the most strongly pro-Papal council ever) when trying to argue against the Papacy.Seems like your anger toward me is displaced.
Why do you, a devout Catholic, fail to go along with what Rome puts out?
349 posted on
02/16/2015 6:57:38 AM PST by
Elsie
( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson