Did you even bother reading the article?
1. He resigned, unexpectedly. He was not "forced out."
2. He admitted and repented of several serious sins which negatively affected the congregation. His leadership, on the whole, was far from "effective."
His sins are considered leadership qualities by some. Lots of Bishops are overflowing with these qualities. Had he not been confronted he undoubtedly would not have considered his “sins” a detriment to his ministry.