this is the same RCC that teaches indulgences, the assumption of mary, the immaculate conception, Jesus had no brothers or sisters and that Mary was a perpetual virgin, that only the pope can tell you what a verse means, that mary is intervening for you, that she is the queen of heaven, that her power is almost unlimited, that peter was the first pope, that he was the primary apostle, that paul acknowledged peter as first amongst the apostle, etc, etc, etc.
if the RCC teaches these non-biblical things why should anyone take their interpretation of anything to be valid?