To: boatbums; Springfield Reformer; daniel1212; BlueDragon; Greetings_Puny_Humans
There WAS no need for a "sinless" mother in order for the Christ to be born and be without sin so that He can make atonement for the sins of the world There is a difference between where Christ is from and whom He saves. That He mingled with sinners is very true; but His sinless mother indicated that He Himself is from where there is no sin.
Catholicism decides what is doctrine
As simple as that. True.
1,391 posted on
04/14/2014 6:02:00 AM PDT by
annalex
(fear them not)
To: annalex
That He mingled with sinners is very true; but His sinless mother indicated that He Himself is from where there is no sin. There you go yet again: presuming FACTS no in evidence.
The sentence above was written by a poor example of Christian faith.
1,400 posted on
04/14/2014 7:34:56 AM PDT by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: annalex
The sentence above was NOT written by a talking ass.>/I>
Numbers 22:28
And the LORD opened the mouth of the ass, and she said unto Balaam, What have I done unto thee, that thou hast smitten me these three times?
1,401 posted on
04/14/2014 7:36:57 AM PDT by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: annalex
There is a difference between where Christ is from and whom He saves. That He mingled with sinners is very true; but His sinless mother indicated that He Himself is from where there is no sin. Catholicism gets it wrong again.
Jesus said He came from the Father. That alone would make Him sinless.
1,414 posted on
04/14/2014 12:21:01 PM PDT by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson