[boatbums]

You can continue to play the victim here as it seems like that is your preferred posture. You once again failed to actually answer my question directly but indirectly you have. Anyone who imagines they must insult, accuse, defame, slander, patronize, LIE or degrade instead of engaging in a discussion on FACTS, demonstrates an inability to defend their position against others who clearly hold to a more Biblical hermeneutic. I won't waste my time - just as I thought all along.

[PhilipFreneau]

>>>You can continue to play the victim here as it seems like that is your preferred posture.<<<

I am no victim, Boatbums. God has blessed my life in ways I could have never imagined.

I do object to false witnessing. Have you made any false witnesses against anyone recently?

>>>Anyone who imagines they must insult, accuse, defame, slander, patronize, LIE or degrade instead of engaging in a discussion on FACTS, demonstrates an inability to defend their position against others who clearly hold to a more Biblical hermeneutic.<<<

I agree 100%.

BTW, do you recall that you claimed that Elijah was the "voice of him crying in the wilderness;" but you also seemed to emphatically deny in a previous thread that John the Baptist was Elijah? And do you recall that earlier you also implied that John the Baptist was the "voice of him crying in the wilderness?"

Were you being hermeneutically consistent? You do remember that, don't you?

Philip