Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Carpe Cerevisi
>>I provided an example along your line of reasoning to help refute your point.<<

No, you didn’t. You provided examples of others you believe do things that can’t be found taught by the apostles.

>>And how do you know that the apostles never taught about the Assumption of Mary?<<

Paul clearly stated that if someone came teaching something they didn’t it was to be considered “another gospel” and therefore “accursed”. I can find no evidence from their writings that they taught the assumption of Mary which is a large part of Catholic belief. It must therefore be considered “another gospel” and “accursed”.

83 posted on 01/30/2014 7:37:01 AM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: CynicalBear
I won't derail the thread any longer. This may explain the Assumption of Mary better than I ever could.

http://thedivinemercy.org/news/story.php?NID=3691
84 posted on 01/30/2014 7:50:03 AM PST by Carpe Cerevisi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson