Smvoice isn’t being rude. Narses is Catholic, and one of the more loud ones on the forum. (But not a lot to say.) Smvoice is merely responding to Narses’ misrepresenting our position. Obviously no one actually believes that the elect can sin all they like. Our position has already been firmly stated in other posts in this thread, so all of this is really just going over old ground again.
So what? What does being Catholic have to do with scriptural truth?
I acknowledge that I am coming in at the middle of the discussion, but I am in steadfast agreement with anyone - Catholic or not - who points out that OSAS is bunk.
The Bible is quite clear that we will be judged for unconfessed sin. And that covers sin both before and after the point we declare ourselves 'saved'. Revelations is quite clear that even believers can end up in the burning lake of fire.
Which position would that be? The opne that baptizes adults only, the one that says immersion only, the one that says pouring is okay or may be sprinkling?
Oh I know the one that is OSAS, oh wait some of you are perseverance people.
The truth is, if protestants will admit it, there is no one single protestant position; on anything.