To: JCBreckenridge; Iscool; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; ...
So the bible says nothing of the sort until you interpolate it in. Interesting. What other interpolations have been inserted? Now, THAT'S funny, coming from a Catholic.
Catholicism teaches all sorts of things that are not mentioned by name, specific wording of which Catholics approve, and yet when a non-Catholic believes something that is not specifically spelled out the way a Catholic wants it to be, then suddenly the Bible doesn't teach it all all but rather it's the non-Catholics own personal errant interpretation.
The hypocrisy abounds.
531 posted on
07/15/2013 6:59:41 AM PDT by
metmom
(For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
To: metmom
You’re missing the point. We aren’t ones saying that all HAS to be in the Bible. So, no, we’re not being hypocritical.
532 posted on
07/15/2013 7:04:05 AM PDT by
piusv
To: metmom
“Now, THAT’S funny, coming from a Catholic.”
We weren’t the ones who inserted ‘alone’, etc. Very often you’ll find protestants turning a something that is both/neither into either/or where it is entirely inappropriate. Scripture OR Tradition. Faith OR works,
539 posted on
07/15/2013 7:45:16 AM PDT by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: metmom
The Scriptures do support them as being the sole supreme rule of faith, as explained
herein .
560 posted on
07/15/2013 10:01:49 AM PDT by
daniel1212
(Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson