You are familiar with a Baptism of Water.
You may not be familiar with a Baptism of Desire.
You also may not be familiar with a Baptism of Blood.
You may want to do some additional studying before you posot nonsensical (in my opinion) things like what you posted here — only partially true.
There’s no such thing as a baptism of desire or the other one. It does not exist in the scripture. It is also quite silly, since it basically means that someone is saved by having faith in the work of baptism. So basically you hold to my position, except mine puts the saving faith on Christ and not the work. This is the most logical position, since we know the Thief and Cornelius were thinking on Christ and not baptism. They werent even taught the latter at the time. You should study the bible instead of farting in my direction.