Yes I did. I identified him as Pope Gregory the First to you directly, TWICE.
Interesting. What posting mnmbers were they?
Is it me, or are you marvelous at wasting people’s time?
AntiCatholics are normally good at wasting people's time.
“Pope” Gregory placing the throne of Peter under three Bishops:
I shall not violate the rules of the Forum by calling you an idiot. Read it again.
First of all, this is one scenario, and its not even a scenario. It’s basically a scenario wherein you utterly ignore what I wrote. The simple answer is: No. It has nothing to do with the Pre-Tridentine mass. If you read the quote, you would not have said it had anything to do with the Pre-Tridentine mass. The quote I provided you says nothing about the Pre-Tridentine mass.
I shall not once again call you an idiot. I asked you if what you were referring to was the Tridentine Mass.
“Dioscorus, however, refuses to abide by these decisions; he is turning the See of the blessed Mark upside down; and these things he does though he perfectly well knows that the Antiochene (of Antioch) metropolis possesses the throne of the great Peter, who was teacher of the blessed Mark, and first and coryphæus (head of the choir) of the chorus of the apostles.” Theodoret - Letter LXXXVI - To Flavianus, Bishop of Constantinople.
So to you any invidual who is connected with the Catholic Church who produces any script, is to be taken a face value? Do you have no clue as to what the Magisterium is?
“I shall not violate the rules of the Forum by calling you an idiot. Read it again.”
So that’s your big refutation to a quote by Pope Gregory the First? Well, uh, you really got me on this one.
“So to you any invidual who is connected with the Catholic Church who produces any script, is to be taken a face value? Do you have no clue as to what the Magisterium is?”
The magisterium back then believed that the See of Peter was divided between the Bishop of Antioch, Alexandria and Rome. Thus, that is why “Pope” Gregory, whom you say is the Universal Pastor (though he himself rejected the notion of the Universal Bishop, calling it the spirit of anti-Christ) and Theodoret, a Bishop, expressed that.
If even a “Pope” and a valuable Bishop can’t be believed when he denies the Primacy of Rome, I’m not sure who we CAN believe in the Roman Catholic church.
Well, I guess they weren’t actually Roman Catholics, at least as we understand them today.