Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dutchboy88

Actually it’s infer.

Yes or no, Dutchboy?


47 posted on 11/13/2012 12:24:48 PM PST by JCBreckenridge (They may take our lives... but they'll never take our FREEDOM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: JCBreckenridge

The word should have been “implying.”


50 posted on 11/13/2012 12:46:22 PM PST by Arthur McGowan (If you're FOR sticking scissors in a baby's neck and sucking out her brains, you are PRO-WOMAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: JCBreckenridge
"Actually it’s infer.

Yes or no, Dutchboy?

It's imply. The sender implies, the receiver infers. If you are referring to something I said, you would say, "Are you implying that if one did not vote for Romney they are pro-abortion." I would then ask, "Are you inferring that from what I said?"

But, frankly, I cannot tell how you would infer that from what I said. Help me out, here.

One would certainly infer from someone voting for Obama that the person was a liberal, deeply committed to the radical left causes such as abortion, homosexuality, re-distribution of wealth, breakdown of nuclear family, hatred of Scriptural perspective of morality, fiscal recklessness, etc. I just have no idea where your question came from.

The thread is about a bunch of "bishops" getting grief from a "cardinal" because they all voted in favor of abortion. Where is Romney?

51 posted on 11/13/2012 12:47:00 PM PST by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson