“so what theological book are you parroting?”
Parroting?
Gee, I’m sorry, I thought we were having a discussion.
I often quote other people when they’ve said something better than I could or better than I have time to. I really don’t think that’s uncommon.
I don’t care to enter into a quarrel.
Your post with it different definitions appeared to be out out of a book or a theological web page if it was not my apologies. There is no biblical basses or biblical reference that they are both the same. From this point of view it could be carried out that all those who are not of the line of seth are of the seed of the snake and therefore we have just invented a new biblical reference that the seed of the snake are of a certain race. See how this is dangerous.
Your post with it different definitions appeared to be out out of a book or a theological web page if it was not my apologies. There is no biblical basses or biblical reference that they are both the same. From this point of view it could be carried out that all those who are not of the line of seth are of the seed of the snake and therefore we have just invented a new biblical reference that the seed of the snake are of a certain race. See how this is dangerous.