Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah
Catholic schools in Canada are semi-public, part of the consequence of not having a First Amendment, and having a large formerly-Catholic Francophone minority, which traditionally has demanded that their language, culture, and religion get special treatment.

Ironically, the big anti-Catholic-schools push that took place in the US in the late 19th Century, which enacted laws and court decisions that prevented anything like the Canadian situation from occurring here ... starts to look like a very good thing in this day and age of militant government secularism.

6 posted on 10/14/2011 5:04:55 AM PDT by Campion ("Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies when they become fashions." -- GKC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Campion
Dear Campion,

“Ironically, the big anti-Catholic-schools push that took place in the US in the late 19th Century, which enacted laws and court decisions that prevented anything like the Canadian situation from occurring here ... starts to look like a very good thing in this day and age of militant government secularism.”

Which is why my thinking has moved away from the idea of vouchers for private school education.

My favorite idea is PJ O'Rourke’s, which is to just blow up all the public schools. However, a more realistic idea might be to provide every family with a massive tax credit (partially or wholly refundable?) for each school-aged child. That credit could be exchanged at the state or local level for a free education at a government-run school, or the parents could make any other arrangements so desired, including homeschooling.

At $5000 or $7500 per child, the decision to homeschool would be available to many more families, as these funds would be available to help defray the loss of a second income in a household.

The credit would be applicable against federal, state or local income taxes, property taxes, or payroll taxes [employer and employee side] (Lots of people pay little or nothing in income tax, but everyone who works pays a great deal in payroll taxes, especially when one adds the employer's side of things.).

It would mean that most families, and especially larger families, would pay little or no net taxes while raising their children, but that's with the understanding that they would be taking on the direct burden of arranging and paying for the education of their own children. And in strictly natural terms, that is the most important function of most folks during their lives - rearing children decently well, educating them, forming them morally and religiously.


sitetest

7 posted on 10/14/2011 5:43:13 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson