1. They didn't perform the study. Somebody else did.
2. They have no methodology listed.
3. They did not state the means or the questions utilized in order to gather the responses.
4. They did not state the groupings or inclusion in the groupings of individual replies.
5. They did not state whether the replies were forced into a model either in the questions themselves, or once the replies were gathered.
6. They did not present the raw data or how the raw data were analyzed.
7. Only the conclusions were published. That is the means that the left wing uses to 'prove' its case.
And yes, since only the left wing of the Catholic Church wants it to become Protestant, I consider you guys left wing. Certainly your theological innovations are parallel to the political left wing as it applies itself to the Constitution. You guys want to reinvent Christianity to your own particular whims; the political left wing wants to reinvent the Constitution to its own particular whims.
As we’ve seen, inconvenient truths are always “flawed” to RC apologists who cannot face the truth.
Ah yes, inconvenient truths. And who uses that term? Not conservatives, and not Christians. Perhaps we should acknowledge the good Dr. E. - pushing the boundaries of liberalism, one liberal Pew 'study' after another. Weren't you just telling me about conservatives joining the Protestant churches? Let's see - would you send me a picture of you and Al Gore next time you're worshiping at another one of his Earth Mother lectures? I'm sure that you get on so well together.
Now tell me true; does Al really do this to all the women he meets?
or just the more attractive masseuses?