Nobody said anything about SS except you. Expecting SOME Scriptural support for any doctrine is not unreasonable and is not SS.
Anyway, the Catholic church uses Scripture to back up the papacy, apostolic succession, transubstantiation, baptism, the priesthood, the keys of heaven and locking people out and all manner of other heresies.
Why not use Scripture to backup that Mary is a mediatrix as the Catholic church claims?
But, hey, thanks for demonstrating that there is none. It goes to show that the whole doctrine of her being a mediatrix is a fairy tale that the Catholic church teaches as truth.
What do you suppose that God will have to say about the Catholic church teaching as true things that are not?
“Nobody said anything about SS except you.”
You’re the one saying something is not true unless it’s in scripture. Hmmm, I think there’s a name for that doctrine...
“Why not use Scripture to backup that Mary is a mediatrix as the Catholic church claims?”
They don’t have to.
“But, hey, thanks for demonstrating that there is none.”
Never did that. But, hey, thanks for demonstrating that you pull conclusions out of your you-know-what. Maybe I just don’t feel like looking up the Scriptural support, since its besides the point.
“her being a mediatrix is a fairy tale that the Catholic church teaches as truth.”
Incidentally, that’s how most people tend to feel about the Jehovah’s Witnesses and their belief that Jesus and Michael Archangel are the same.
“What do you suppose that God will have to say about the Catholic church teaching as true things that are not?”
I guess He wouldn’t like it if it were possible.