And you have? I suppose that that would explain the fact that you either missed or falsified the fact that the Second Amendment Foundation was smeared with being accused by you of using the term 'inconvenient truth' when it turned out that that it was your link description in your own words which parroted a liberal newspaper's own headline and lead for the story which was never in the SAF's press release in any way whatsoever.
I’m curious about whether Dr. E has worked on a newspaper, too. I’ve asked twice, and still have not gotten an answer.
By the way, Mark, there are some more arguments going on in the RF. I’m not sure if we’ve pinged you to all of them, but you’ll probably find all of them by searching through my history.