The second link was incorrect. It was supposed to be this:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2695139/posts?page=650#650
I’ll post a corrected version of 1119.
“The is your mistake - not metmom’s.”
No, it’s metmom’s.
“Being careless can’t be someone else’s fault.”
Metmom’s carelessness was her fault, if it actually was carelessness.
“Here’s how you posted it...
And that last one is the kicker — Mediatrix? Really? Where in scripture did God say this? So..... “
NO where is there any indication it was someone else’s words.”
You dishonestly quote me out of context and then claim that there was no indication that it was someone else’s words when I did use quotation marks to indicate they were someone else’s words. At any rate, if there was any confusion, metmom could have easily referred back to the previous post where she would again have seen that those were Hoss’s words. At any rate, I have asked metmom three times already to apologize for her mistake, and now it will be the fourth. Metmom, I will accept an apology if you admit your mistake, apologize, and ping all the others who you pinged to your false statement to your apology.
“You owe metmom an apology for taunting her for your own mistake or sloppiness in posting.”
You owe me an apology for saying this is my mistake, for saying that I was the one being careless, for dishonestly quoting me out of context, and for claiming that there was no indication that it was someone else’s words.
Here is the link to 944, where metmom made the false statement that she has not yet retracted, despite given multiple opportunities:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2695139/posts?page=944#944
And here is the post metmom falsely used as evidence:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2695139/posts?page=650#650
It’s extremely foolish to think you can get away with dishonestly quoting me out of context and lying about my post when I have the links right here and everyone can see them.