Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: aruanan; Gamecock; RnMomof7
Dr. E is given to overstatement and misstatement

This is the religion forum and you're breaking the rules by "making it personal."

when called on it, says that there are dueling experts and she can, at best, only trust "her own lying eyes."

Funny that you're continuing to harp about my fairly harmless observation that more babies are born around the full moon. You've posted dozens of paragraphs to me in rebuttal to this simple statement. I suppose when one has nothing to argue but still wants to argue, swatting at any pitch will do.

That is, she wants to have her polemical cake and eat it, too.

That statement is also against the rules of the religion forum because it's a type of "mind-reading."

And finally, you are dragging an argument from one thread to another, even from one forum to another.

And that's against the rules of the religion forum.

You're three for three, aruanan.

This thread is about pederast priests raping children and the church that harbors and promotes them. Do you have anything to say about the topic of this thread?

193 posted on 03/14/2011 11:13:37 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Eckleburg
That is, she wants to have her polemical cake and eat it, too.

That statement is also against the rules of the religion forum because it's a type of "mind-reading."

And finally, you are dragging an argument from one thread to another, even from one forum to another.

And that's against the rules of the religion forum.

You're three for three, aruanan.

This thread is about pederast priests raping children and the church that harbors and promotes them. Do you have anything to say about the topic of this thread?


Actually, I was answering a particular question. So let me rephrase the subsequent remark, "That is, certain people give all indications of wanting to have their polemical cake and eat it, too."

There, no mind-reading.
195 posted on 03/15/2011 5:32:49 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

Judge Chastises Priest over Legal-bills Plan
...By David O’Reilly & Nancy Phillips

Inquirer Staff Writers...3/15/11

In court for the first time Monday on charges of sexual assault and child endangerment, four current or former priests and an ex-parochial schoolteacher watched the judge erupt in anger over one’s plan to ask the Philadelphia Archdiocese to pay his legal fees if acquitted.

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110315_Judge_chastises_priest_over_legal-bills_plan.html


196 posted on 03/15/2011 6:48:18 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson