To: Cronos; Gamecock; Religion Moderator
If your (Uri's) protestant group believes its wrong to eat pork, then that's your (Uri's) group's problem, we don't mind what you do, just don't condemn Gamecock and the rest of us for not following Mosaic dietary restrictionsYOU DO KNOW THAT STATEMENT IS A LIE. DO NOT REPEAT IT AGAIN !
1,786 posted on
12/09/2010 8:16:23 AM PST by
Uri’el-2012
(Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
To: UriÂ’el-2012
you do realise this is a question, right?
If your (Uri's) protestant group believes its wrong to eat pork, then that's your (Uri's) group's problem,
we don't mind what you do, just don't condemn Gamecock and the rest of us for not following Mosaic dietary restrictions
We don't mind that you do -- that's no lie, your group can believe it wrong to eat pork.
Just that your group should not condemn Gamecock and the rest of us for not following Mosaic dietary restrictions
Or, wait, do you object to having your group called "Protestant"?
1,787 posted on
12/09/2010 8:19:58 AM PST by
Cronos
(Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis (W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie))
To: UriÂ’el-2012
Let's break down the supposition/question further
If your (Uri's) protestant group believes its wrong to eat pork, then that's your (Uri's) group's problem,
we don't mind what you do, just don't condemn Gamecock and the rest of us for not following Mosaic dietary restrictions
1. If your (Uri's) "protestant" group --> does your group think it's wrong to call your group Protestants?
2. If your group believes it's wrong to eat pork --> does your group believe it is ok to eat pork?
3. Then it's your (Uri's) group's problem --> does your group think it's wrong to say it's your cult's choice to believe what your group wishes to believe?
4. we don't mind what you do, --> does your group believe it wrong to have this "lax" attitude -- does it persecute members who do eat pork?
5. just don't condemn Gamecock and the rest of us for not following Mosaic dietary restrictions --> Note the quote from met -- your group shouldn't condemn the rest of us for not following Mosaic dietary restrictions or believing in the Trinity or the Divinity of Christ.
1,788 posted on
12/09/2010 8:26:23 AM PST by
Cronos
(Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis (W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie))
To: UriÂ’el-2012
And since we're on your group, tell us again why it denies the Divnity of Christ and the Trinity? Does your group have a sound doctrine on why it does this?
Also, the belief that people of Western European descent, particularly those in Great Britain, are the direct lineal descendants of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel is kind of silly, sorry to say that, why does your particular group believe that?
1,792 posted on
12/09/2010 8:31:05 AM PST by
Cronos
(Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis (W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie))
To: UriÂ’el-2012
Oh, and didn’t Jesus say something about calling folks rabbi? Does your group call it’s religious leaders rabbis?
1,793 posted on
12/09/2010 8:31:50 AM PST by
Cronos
(Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis (W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie))
To: UriÂ’el-2012
Do not accuse another Freeper of telling a lie. That is a form of "making it personal" because it attributes motive, the intent to deceive.
Words such as "wrong" "false" "misleading" do not attribute motive.
Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.
To: UriÂ’el-2012; Judith Anne
To Uri:
This is an "open" thread in the Religion Forum. Posters may argue for or against beliefs. They may condemn dieties, religious authorities, beliefs, authors, etc. But they must not "make it personal" - e.g. reading minds, attributing motives, make the thread "about" individual posters. Thick skin is required on "open" RF threads.
If you are not comfortable with this town square style of debate, then IGNORE "open" RF threads altogether and instead post to threads labeled "caucus" "ecumenical" "prayer" or "devotional."
Of course, if you do jump on board then be ready
1,813 posted on
12/09/2010 9:30:33 AM PST by
Cronos
(Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis (W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie))
To: UriÂ’el-2012; Cronos; metmom; Gamecock; Religion Moderator
If your (Uri's) protestant group believes its wrong to eat pork, then that's your (Uri's) group's problem, we don't mind what you do, just don't condemn Gamecock and the rest of us for not following Mosaic dietary restrictions YOU DO KNOW THAT STATEMENT IS A LIE. DO NOT REPEAT IT AGAIN It's nothing but an attempt to cause trouble, everything Cronos posts is an attack on somebody.
I don't eat pork because I don't like it, not because of any "Mosaic dietary restrictions"
1,829 posted on
12/09/2010 9:57:59 AM PST by
1000 silverlings
(everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson