Why would Rome keep a known and convicted pedophile in priestly robes?
He belongs in jail, not decked out in religious garb.
The truth is that as we have been told by Roman Catholics on this forum, once a Roman Catholic priest, always a Roman Catholic priest. They live and die as an "alter Christus," another Christ no matter what crimes and perversions they have committed.
Why? Because "another Christ" is not like the rest of us. The RCC says the priest is greater than the rest of us, more holy, closer to God, and therefore entitled to whatever pleasurable larks he might feel the need to experience.
Generations of young children have been corrupted by these men. We look around and wonder why there are so many homosexuals these days. Well, we have one reason. Rome breeds them in-house.
I'm reasonably certain that if the civil authorities had ordered incarceration the guilty party would in fact be... incarcerated. I know you're not suggesting that the Catholic Church should take the law into its own hands and take over the courts... I mean... well no, that would be a bad idea probably... maybe. I mean I'm all for jailing unrepentant heretics but no...
As it happens I'd support making the Church pay the costs incurred in confining a priest convicted of a crime like the sort that are the subject of this thread (huh... I'll go all over the place to avoid writing it out)
Please post the official teaching document of the Catholic Church that says that a priest is "entitled to whatever pleasurable larks he might feel the need to experience".
Post it right here.
Prove your charges, or admit that you're making them up.
Here, let me help: You're making them up.