Well, I think that depends - did this theoretical married adolescent ask his/her spouse if having sex with the local Catholic priest was okay, and did the spouse grant permission? Does this mean that it's not "rape-rape"?
I guess you care more about destroying the Catholic Church (what will be the reason you give God?) than you do about the child sexual abuse in your own church.
The three most common types of "making it personal" on the Religion Forum are: 1) attributing motives to the other Freeper, 2) reading his mind or telling him what he personally believes, and 3) making the thread "about" individual Freepers. I do believe that Post #273 is remarkably concise trifecta of all three being committed.
Non-sequitur. The statement was made that sex with any 13 or 14 yo was rape. The truth is, not in the case of a married 13 or 14 yo. How many cases of presbyterian minister child sexual abuse have occurred since 1950? I submit we will never know, it has all been hushed up. That clearly shows that presbyterians and other anti-Catholic bigots care far more about slandering the Catholic Church than finding and rooting out their own sins. As has been said, it isn't so much the sin, as the coverup.
That was a GUESS on my part, from the evidence of your posts. I stated it was a guess. Feel free to express concern about the child abuse in your own church. It will give the lie to my statement.
lol. “Trifecta.” It’s about all they’re winning these days.
*