Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Salvation

Arroyo is correct, they didn’t even put protections in for the elderly.

More importantly, this was a governmental ruse to get it passed. Unless a conservative filibusters the Senate, they will pass a compromise package in the Senate.

When the bill goes to Conference, the trains has left the station. The machinations of Congress will demand a bill. They will do whatever they have to do to pass a bill.

The ignorant-of-government Bishops will be long forgotten.

They may or may not get abortions language in the final bill, but it won’t be due to the Bishops, it will be based on the pork that key members gets for their vested interests.

This is why I feel the Bishops should be concentrating on saving souls and not the evil machinations of government.

jmo


6 posted on 11/08/2009 4:55:51 PM PST by rbmillerjr (It's us against them...the Establishment RINOs vs rank and file...Sarah Palin or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: rbmillerjr
This is why I feel the Bishops should be concentrating on saving souls and not the evil machinations of government.

However effective or ineffective they may be the bishops have a responsibility to speak out in matters of morals facing their flock and its civil government. In fact, this is one of the ways in which they work to save souls.

This idea dates back to at least the 5th century when Pope Gelasius I proposed that the Church has two swords to wield, one with regard to the spiritual order and the other in regard to the temporal order when it comes to moral matters.

The history in the intervening 1500 years has been fascinating.

9 posted on 11/08/2009 5:05:09 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson