Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: kosta50; Iscool

“And biblical manuscripts were not?”

Kosta, compared to the agenda driven English translations, starting with the KJV, the old Codex manuscripts are positively pristine! :)


201 posted on 08/09/2009 10:44:24 AM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]


To: Kolokotronis; Iscool
Kosta, compared to the agenda driven English translations, starting with the KJV, the old Codex manuscripts are positively pristine! :)

You know that's not true, Kolo. the 4th century Codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are full of differences and Codex Alexandrinus, a mere century later, is almost like a different book. Not to talk about various shreds and 'chads' form earlier days.

But the more time progressed and more corrupt copies of copies of copies entered into circulation, the more the corruption multiplied. Certainly, KJV is at the apex of that process, both linguistically and otherwise compared to the earlier ones. After all, 1,600 had years passed since the originals were presumably written, and then subsequently lost in translation and otherwise.

213 posted on 08/09/2009 1:48:31 PM PDT by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson