Replies

I am re-posting one of my posts from another thread on RELICS. FYI.

Relics are completely consistent with both Scripture and Church tradition -- both of which never conflict with one another.

But, first, let's be clear. Catholics do not worship relics in the way we worship God, through adoration. Relics are not worshipped, but rather honored or venerated. Big difference. It's okay to honor or venerate a person other than God. Remember the 4th commandment? Honor your mother and father. You can do that, and God wants you to do it. We are to honor or venerate everything about them, both their bodies and their souls -- everything associated with them, including their bodily remains after their death. That's our duty; it's the Law. If you buried your father in a cheap, burlap sack and dumped Him in the river with a send off with your middle finger, it's time for confession. That's a big sin.

So, there is nothing wrong with honoring or venerating a person. We are required to honor or venerate our parents, and we are allowed to honor or venerate whomever we feel is deemed worthy of that esteem. In fact, we are encouraged to do that, because people who are holy can serve as good role models -- we should follow their example. That's the primary function of the Saints and their veneration: they serve as role models for us. We want to get to Heaven; they already got there. We can look to them to help lead the way Home.

Just like we honor the remains of our parents when we bury them and hold a funeral in their honor--and just as we all keep relics of our deceased loved ones (pictures, a lock of hair, a cherished books with notes in the margins, a painting, clothing, heirlooms, etc.), we can keep and honor relics of the Saints. We certainly don't want to desecrate them! Nor do we want to be lukewarm and indifferent to them. And we can't worship and adore them, as we would God. So what is left? Honor and veneration. No other reasonable option left, is there?

Honoring and venaration of relics is a good thing! In A.D. 787, the 7th Ecumenical Council condemned "those who dare to reject any one of the things which are entrusted to the Church, the Gospel, or the sign of the cross, or any pictorial representation, or the holy relics of a martyr." A martyr is one kind of Saint. So, that's a pretty big endorsement for relics.

The Council of Trent told bishops and pastors to communicate to their diocese and parishes that "the holy bodies of saintly martyrs and others now living with Christ - which bodies were the living members of Christ and the temple of the Holy Ghost and which are by Him to be raised unto eternal life and glorified - are to be venerated by the faithful, for through these (bodies) many benefits are bestowed by God on men; so that they who affirmed that veneration and honor are not due to the relics of Saints, or that these and other sacred monuments are uselessly honored by the faithful, . . . are wholly to be condemned, as the Church has already long since condemned and now also condemns them".

For those Sola Scriptura folks, yes, it's all in Scripture.

Exodus 13:19
Moses took the bones of Joseph with him, for he had made the sons of Israel solemnly swear, saying, "God will surely take care of you, and you shall carry my bones from here with you."

2 Kings 13:20-21
And it came to pass, as they were burying a man, that behold, they spied a band [of men]; and they cast the man into the sepulcher of Elisha: and when the man was let down, and touched the bones of Elisha, he revived, and stood on his feet.

Sirach 49:18
And his bones were visited, and after death they prophesied. They prophesied... That is, by their being carried out of Egypt they verified the prophetic prediction of Joseph. [Genesis 50]

Matt. 9:20
20Just then a woman who had been subject to bleeding for twelve years came up behind him and touched the edge of his cloak. 21She said to herself, "If I only touch his cloak, I will be healed."

Acts 15-16
As a result, people[f] kept carrying their sick into the streets and placing them on stretchers and mats so that at least Peter's shadow might fall on some of them as he went by. 16Even from the towns around Jerusalem crowds continued coming in to bring their sick and those who were troubled by unclean spirits, and all of them were healed.

Acts 19:11
God continued to do extraordinary miracles through Paul.[d] 12When handkerchiefs and aprons that had touched his skin were taken to the sick, their diseases left them and evil spirits went out of them.

Not only is veneration of relics Scriptural, the early fathers of the church also venerated relics.

See, for example, the Acts of St. Polycarp (AD 156), where it is written, "We adore Him (Christ), because He is the Son of God, but the martyrs we love as disciples and imitators of the Lord...Then we buried in a becoming place his (St. Polycarp's) remains, which are more precious to us than the costliest diamongs, and which we esteem more highly than gold."

St. Ambrose told a story about the healing of a blind men as he encountered the bodies of Sts. Gervasius and Protasius. "You know," he said, "nay you have seen with your own eyes, how many were delivered from demons and a great number were cured of diseases when they touched the garments of the saints; how there was a repetition of the miracles of the early days when, in consequence of the advernt of our Lord Jesus Christ, abundament grace was showered down upon the earth."

St. Cyril of Jerusalem says: "This holy wood of the Cross is still to be seen among us; and through the agency of those who piously took home particles thereof, it has filled the whole earth."

St. Chrysostom relayed a story about how people at one time worse articles of the Cross in golden lockets on their necks, and St. Augustine said, "we have not erected an altar to the martyr, Stephen, but with the relics of the martyr Stephen we have erected an altar to God."