The proposition of a “spiritual contract” is an interesting notion, but I am not sure that it is supported by this scripture. Daniel references:
<< Jeremiah 25 >>
New American Standard Bible ©
Babylon Will Be Judged
12 Then it will be when seventy years are completed I will punish the king of Babylon and that nation, declares the LORD, for their iniquity, and the land of the Chaldeans; and I will make it an everlasting desolation. 13 I will bring upon that land all My words which I have pronounced against it, all that is written in this book which Jeremiah has prophesied against all the nations.
The first thing I see here is that our soveriegn God is unilaterally telling the people of Israel what is going to happen, not the formation of a contract. In this case He gives them an option out if they repent, which they did not. While Daniel repented for them, no where do I see that this was a condition of what God said He would do after 70 years. Perhaps we are to infer that, had Daniel not been spiritually perceptive and known to repent, as this contract theory suggests, that God’s prophetic word would have failed?
mms://media.winworld.com/voe/mannafest432.wmv
Is a Manna Fest 1/2 preaching on America and its Fullness of Time, “Has America Entered the Fullness of Time? - Part 2.” Very worth the watching.
Home URL=voe.org.
Links to this and other videos= http://voe.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=39&Itemid=52
Most interesting interpretation.
Interesting, but my guess is that Daniel was also considering Jeremiah 29:10. And it was this verse that prompted his repentance.