To: adiaireton8
Dear adiareton8,
On the mark.
I’d clarify, however, that those who marry who are infertile without culpability are not persons with an intention to avoid having children.
sitetest
20 posted on
07/31/2007 12:24:15 PM PDT by
sitetest
(If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
To: sitetest
True. But as I understand it, those with known [antecedent and perpetual] impotence or sterility cannot enter into marriage. That is an impediment to a valid marriage.
-A8
22 posted on
07/31/2007 12:30:49 PM PDT by
adiaireton8
("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson